on private cars in Manhattan

In today’s The New York Times Magazine “The Ethicist” delivers the last word on behalf of New Yorkers who have just about had it with the assault of those infernal machines – and specificallly, the continuing outrage of on-street parking.

Two of my neighbors are in cahoots. When one pulls his car out of a spot, the other is always parked directly in front or behind and moves his car just enough to take up two spaces, so no other car can squeeze in. When the first car returns, the other moves back, restoring parking spots for both. Is it ethical for them to save spaces for each other, instead of leaving one for another parking-deprived New Yorker? Joseph A. Moskal, New York
If either of them were ethical, they wouldn’t use private cars in Manhattan, a city with excellent public transportation. Why should the non-car-owning majority allow the car-owning minority to store their private property, i.e. cars, on public property at no charge? Why should my every walk to the store be akin to a stroll through a parking lot? Why should that majority be subject to the many costs and risks to health and safety attendant on the private car? I’m sorry: could you repeat the question?

a gay Askew


Othniel “Niel” Boaz Askew
[Photo by Victor Carnuccio]
The story about Askew most people won’t hear is in the Gay City News.

Emanuel Xavier is a gay poet and author who frequented many of the same nightclubs as Askew did back in the 1990s. This past December, Davis honored Xavier and other LGBT activists at the Councilmember’s Holiday Pride event at Long Island University. According to Xavier, around 1995, he and [Clifford Nass, Askew’s roommate at the time] dated for several months, well before Askew’s 1996 arrest.
During his relationship with Nass, Xavier spent a considerable amount of time in the West 43rd Street apartment.
He recalled Askew as “an incredibly sweet person,” saying that “the media is portraying him as a monster and he wasn’t one despite committing such an inhumane act.”
. . . .
Despite Xavier positive recollections about Askew, he also recalled signs of a troubled side to the man.
“He had issues with being comfortable within his own skin,” Xavier said. “He was concerned about his image. We often joked about how he was so white. In connecting with me as a person of color, I think he was trying to be comfortable with himself and always complimented me on being an out artist who was proud of who I was.”
The two men maintained a casual acquaintance, running into each other occasionally at gay events.
“I ran into him on and off for the last several years,” Xavier said. “The last time I saw him was last year at the Roxy. He looked really good.”
Like [Victor Carnuccio, a friend of Askew’s who had photographed him in 1992], Xavier noted that Askew had bulked up, with a noticeably muscular physique.
“It was a very brief conversation. He told me about going into politics,” said Xavier. “When I read about Councilmember Davis threatening to out him it was so surprising because he was already so out and on the scene.”

What’s it all mean? I suspect there are more tales to be heard before this story dies.
We’re free now, and some of us just won’t shut up.

how will it be read?

Is the story going to be “Wacko AIDS homo slays saintly populist in hallowed hall?” Or will it be, Homophobia helped to destroy two lives – again?”
Interesting developments available from the media today:
Askew’s police record, supposedly sealed, was somehow made know to Davis.
Since his record was (supposedly) sealed, Askew purchased a gun legally .
The gun Askew used to kill Davis was bought in North Carolina.
Askew and Davis were allowed to skip the metal detectors.
The little girls with tiaras, there for a presentation, got screened.
“Court records” (still officially sealed) indicate Askew was HIV-positive.
Askew had once planned a modelling career – apparently with good reason.
Askew was beautiful.
His former lawyer describes Askew as “a charmer.”
Askew may have thought the charming Davis had been flirting with him.
But see these commercial sites for the complete (sometimes hysterical) news stories:
NYTimes
Newsday
Daily News
Post
NY1

White House of cards


Need a lift, Lefty cynics? Look at Mark Morford’s upbeat column today. I’ve been feeling it in my bones myself for a while, thinking at first it was the humidity. Things are happening. Although Morford warns it’s not yet time for delicious plates of schadenfreude, we and the administration now know “Shrub’s numbers are down.”

This is what happens when it’s all a house of cards.
This is what happens when you build your entire presidency on an intricate network of aww-shucks glibness and bad hair and cronyism and corporate fellatio and warmongering and sham enemies and economy-gutting policies and endless blank-eyed smirks that tell the world, every single day, whelp, sure ’nuff, the U.S. is full of it.

“Michael” “Exposed”


Orly Cogan “Michael” embroidery, paint on printed cotton fabric 18″x18″

Orly Cogan “Exposed” embroidery, paint on printed cotton fabric 18″x18″
Now I know why the crowd was not quite as intimidating as I had expected at the fabulous Reverend Jen’s Troll Museum opening at Printed Matter last night!
It wasn’t because of an interruption in L train service this time. ACRIA was holding a benefit and juried exhibition at Lehmann Maupin Gallery a few blocks away at the same time, and it wasn’t just the free sparkling stuff in real glasses that had attracted the huge crowd.
They were almost giving away ($150, duh!) hot works by hot young artists picked by hot older artists – and for the benefit of a wonderful institution! Everyone wins.
We had forgotten the time-sensitive nature of the event, so we arrived after just about everything had been sold. Otherwise the two extraordinary Orly Cogan works reproduced above, which were scooped up in the first few minutes, might now be ours. Orly’s third image, not reproduced here, was titled, “Puppy Love.”
The art will remain on the walls of the gallery until August 2.

report from Palestine, July 24, 2003


Steve and friends in an olive grove near Jayyous
Steve has been characteristically busy, but he writes home:

Qalqilya, Occupied Palestine
Thursday, July 24, 2003
On Monday night we learned that a time bomb had been
found by security near the farmers’ gate, and was
detonated by the Israeli army. As a result, the area
around the gate was closed by the army and was
crawling with troops. We decided not to attempt
access to the lands west of the fence on Tuesday.
There has been speculation here that the Israeli army
planted the time bomb in order to justify widening
their off-limits zone on either side of the fence.
Tuesday morning, we participated in a demonstration
organized by all the political parties in Qalqilya in
support of Palestinian political prisoners in Israeli
prisons. We started with a short talk at the Qalqilya
branch of the Palestine Prisoners’ Association, a very
important group made up of former prisoners (i.e. just
about any Palestinian man) which provides support for
prisoners and for their families. They explained to
us that their current focus is to have 3 prisons
located on army bases (Howwara, Salem, and I can’t
remember the third) closed because the conditions
there are so harsh as to violate not only
international law, but Israeli law as well.
The demonstration was in the Qalqilya demonstration
style: loud, colorful, and short. ISM was there with
banners and signs (a picture of us made it into the
Palestinian daily Al-Ayyam today), and we’re told that
people were really happy to see us there. There was a
group of boys in front of us-little boys, not
teenagers-who were chanting energetically without
apparent adult guidance. I was struck by how these
boys see themselves as empowered members of the
resistance to Israeli occupation and injustice.
There were family members of prisoners at the demo
carrying photos of their imprisoned loved ones-some of
the people carrying photos were little kids.
The demo went from the city circle to the office of
the International Committee of the Red Cross/Geneva,
where Lysander and I joined the officers of the
various political parties and the head of the
Prisoners’ Association to present letters to the ICRC
with our concerns. The ICRC representative was an
Australian who could only talk about ICRC policy,
passing on concerns to the Jerusalem and Tel Aviv
offices, etc. The official meeting was interrupted by
some women who demanded to know why they were being
denied permits to visit their sons, and wanted to know
what ICRC was going to do about it. One has two sons
in prison, and had been denied a permit as a “security
risk”. She wanted to know how she, an old woman,
could be a security risk? Another also had two sons
in prison, had been granted a permit to visit one, and
was deemed a security risk when she applied for a
permit to visit the other. She wanted to know how she
could be eligible for a permit for one visit, yet a
security risk for the other. They represented Israeli
policies about family visitation as cruel and
arbitrary, and expressed frustration at the ICRC’s
apparent impotence.
In the afternoon, we met with Faris, the local
coordinator for a village called Mas’ha, and 5 from
our action group (3 from JAtO) volunteered to go there
for a couple of days. Mas’ha has hosted a peace
encampment along the fence for months now, and it has
become a place for Israelis, Palestinians and
internationals from all walks of life to come together
in dialogue and in opposition to the fence. The 5
return tomorrow, and I look forward to hearing more
about Mas’ha Camp.
I was talking with a little boy in front of our
building, and one of the adults pointed out to me that
his father was killed by the Israeli army. There are
6 children in the family.
Late in the evening, some local Muslim leaders came
over to talk with us about Islam. They are people who
dedicate their lives to the service of Allah and the
duty to be a good person, and I was thinking about how
painful it must be for them to hear Islam slandered by
political and religious leaders in the U.S., Israel,
and elsewhere. Their talk was a little too much like
a visit from the Jehovah’s Witnesses for my taste, but
they were well-intentioned, and we had a good time
just shooting the breeze after they were done with
their spiel.
I was awakened at 3:00 yesterday morning by Jihad, a
young man who spends time with us internationals. He
was alarmed that Israeli army jeeps had entered the
city, and a couple of internationals walked him home.
We then bolted our door, and I didn’t sleep very well
as I waited for the alarm to ring at 5:00. At 6:00
[the hours seem to be accidently transposed in these
few lines – JAW] I saw a jeep driving right near our
apartment, and quickly ducked inside.
I was up at 5:00 for attempt #3 to go out with the
farmers – successful this time!! There were no
soldiers or security at the farmers’ gate, and we high
-tailed it into the fields west of the fence. We
ducked behind some trees as construction vehicles and
security sped past, and were not spotted.
We were horrified, however, to see that the Israeli
army had dug a trench between the gate and the road
from Qalqilya, and piled the dirt and boulders up
before the trench. Passage into the lands outside of
the fence, impossible by car, truck, or tractor for
months, is now impassable by donkey as well. Farmers
must bring in their crops on foot. Some of the trees
immediately west of the fence and its attendant jeep
road had been destroyed by a tank or a bulldozer.
Mohammad from the Peasants’ Union took us around the
lands of Qalqilya and Jayyous all morning. We stopped
and talked with many farmers (and drank tea, natch).
The scene was idyllic – carob, loquat, orange, avocado,
fig, berry, and olive trees, grape vines, fields of
cauliflower, tomatoes, cucumbers, peppers, and
eggplant, lovely little farmers’ day huts, and a huge
chicken house. But the idyll was marred by the fence,
this awful gash that cuts across Palestinian farmers’
lands. We passed many dried up fields and abandoned
greenhouses belonging to farmers who just can’t get
through the security at the gate. We encountered
numerous road blocks; many dirt roads within this
agricultural area have been rendered impassable by the
Israeli army. Some of the lands are on the other side
of a settlement bypass road put in during the Oslo
process, and no Palestinian agricultural roads are
allowed to intersect with this Israeli-only West Bank
highway built on confiscated Palestinian land.
Farmer after farmer told us about the assaults on
their livelihood caused by the fence. One man has a
property that was cut in half by the fence. He used
to go from one olive grove to the next by walking a
few meters. Now he has to walk half an hour to the
farmers’ gate, and half an hour back. Another has a
number of farm vehicles at home. He can get none of
them onto his land. He has to bring in his crops by
donkey cart, and then unload them by hand onto a
vehicle at the roadblock. Some farmers have taken to
sleeping in the fields during the week, because the
way home has now been made so circuitous and long. To
make matters worse, Israel has declared economic war
on Palestinian areas during this Intifada, no longer
allowing Palestinians to export, and using roadblocks
and checkpoints to impede commerce within Palestine.
Qalqilya was once the bread basket of the West Bank,
with exports to Jordan and Iraq as well. Now, all
produce goes to market in Qalqilya, at a fraction of
the price.
The attached photo shows me, Andrea from California,
and Eric from Sweden sitting with Mohammad and 3
farmers from Jayyous in an olive grove, talking about
the difficulties of harvesting caused by the fence.
We crossed back through the farmers’ gate quickly and
without incident. There was a security vehicle there,
but no personnel. We went to the farm of Ziad, also
of the Peasants’ Union, for lunch. He and his son
made a delicious feast for us, cooking everything with
vegetables he picked as he cooked. While we waited
for lunch to be ready, Mohammad told me about reading
Angela Davis’s book about prison in the U.S. while he
was in prison in Israel, and talked about how similar
the conditions are. He also told me about the little
girl in Qalqilya who’s named Angela, after Angela
Davis.
Ziad’s farm is breathtaking, but his property, which
used to extend further than it now does, is abruptly
cut off by the fence. The contrast between the beauty
of well-tended fields of tomatoes and cauliflower, and
rolls of accordion wire blocking entrance to the ditch
in front of the fence, is enough to make one cry.
Back in town, we visited a house that had been visited
during the night by the Israeli army (hence the jeeps
we saw). There were eleven people in the house: 3
women, one 13-year-old boy, and the rest little girls
(one a baby). We saw hundreds and hundreds of bullet
holes in the house outside and inside, including in
one of the women’s dresses in her closet. It’s a
miracle that no one was shot or killed, and I can’t
imagine how frightened the children must have been.
One little girl (I can’t say how old she is; I usually
underestimate the age of Palestinian children because
they look so small. Perhaps it’s malnutrition?) was
eager to show us the damage, and they all welcomed the
attention. The teenage boy lay in a fetal position on
a mat, having had his stomach stomped on by Israeli
border guards in an attempt to force him to say where
they can find the man they were looking for. They
never found the wanted man, so they took another man
from the family, 26 years old, beat him, and arrested
him. He may be facing 6 months of administrative
detention now; under Israeli law, no charges have to
be laid for administrative detention to occur.
For the past 2 days our action group has been meeting
with community members about our proposed action at
the Qalqilya wall on Wednesday. This morning I
participated in meetings at the Palestine People’s
Party with someone from the Farmers’ Union, and at the
Chamber of Commerce with the Chamber’s president.
Everyone has the same story – total economic devastation
as a result of closure and the wall. The rest of the
day has been preparation for the action – it’s a giant
undertaking, but we hope it will be spectacular.
Tomorrow morning I’m off to document the plight of the
villages south of Qalqilya, which have themselves been
encircled by the wall.

Then President Bush’s canon will come back to us: “You’re either with us or with the terrorists.” Those words hang in time like icicles. For years to come, butchers and genocidists will fit their grisly mouths around them (“lip-sync,” flimmakers call it) to justify their butchery.
Arundhati Roy
September, 2002

And with that he closes for the night.
For more news, from the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) site itself, see the story, “Palestinian Farmers Break Gate in the Wall.”

“cherchez la femme”

[updated information added to the bottom of this post]
Only this time “cherchez l’homme” might be a more useful suggestion.
Neither James E. Davis (41) nor Othiel Boaz Askew (31) had ever married. Both were described as bright, attractive, smart dressers, ambitious, real talkers – and at least a little kooky.
Today the NYTimes capsule story on Askew reveals something missing so far from other accounts of yesterday’s tragedy.

“The councilman [Davis] began to think of himself as something of a mentor to him,” said Amyre Loomis, who was Mr. Davis’s spokeswoman. Ms. Loomis said Mr. Askew had asked Mr. Davis to write a letter for him saying that Mr. Askew had a promising future in public service.
But according to a law enforcement official, Mr. Askew gave a very different version of events when he called in a complaint to the F.B.I. against Mr. Davis yesterday, claiming that Mr. Davis had threatened him.
James Margolin, a spokesman for the F.B.I.’s New York office, said yesterday: “Late this morning, a caller who identified himself as Askew alleged that he was the victim of harassment by Councilman Davis in connection with the upcoming primary election. He expressed no intention to cause harm to Councilman Davis.”
According to the complaint, Mr. Askew and Mr. Davis took a walk together earlier this month through Fort Greene Park, and the councilman said he had done a background check on Mr. Askew that he claimed revealed that he was gay and that the information might be exposed in the race. Mr. Askew considered this a threat, the law enforcement official said.

Ooops! This just in.
Now NY1 tells us a little more.

Police said [Askew had] been arrested in the past, convicted of harassment in 1996 after hitting his live-in boyfriend with a hammer in a domestic dispute and leaving him bruised and bleeding. Askew was also charged in 1999 with stealing a leather bag from another male friend. Both incidents were in Manhattan.

the Times does Paul P.


colored pencil on paper (2002) [not in the current show]
I’ve been neglectful.
Almost didn’t mention the wonderful review which Paul P.‘s show at Daniel Reich received this past week from Holland Cotter in the NYTimes.
So I’ll print the entire text to make up for the delay.

Paul P.
Daniel Reich
308 West 21st Street, 2A, Chelsea
Through Aug. 2
Paul P., who is based in Toronto, makes an attractive New York solo debut with this show of 20 colored-pencil portraits of young men. Seductive, reflective or goofy, the pictures look informal enough to have been taken from life, though each face comes from gay pornography of the 1970’s and early 80’s.
Paul P. has done much to aestheticize his subjects. The obvious model is Whistler, with his wispy touch and a Symbolist sensibility, though most of the Whistlerian effects are relegated to background elements: patterned wallpaper, flowers or shimmery curtains in bleached pink, sooty lavender and jaundice yellow. By contrast, the faces are rendered carefully and deliberately, with each beautiful feature and gauche flaw carefully observed, like those of Caravaggio’s punk-angels.
Given the identity of Paul P.’s subjects — sexually active men at the beginning of the AIDS era — the drawings can’t help seeming like memorial portraits. At the same time the work is different in tone from most art produced during the AIDS crisis. These aren’t heroicizing or mournful portraits: however historically aware, they’re secondhand, distanced, dandified and oddly unsensual, as if their homoeroticism was taken for granted, or beside the point, or part of some larger, still-developing content or style.
What the developments will be, I’m not sure. But place Paul P.’s work with that of other young artists like Christian Holstad, Assume Vivid Astro Focus (a k a Eli Sudbrack), Scott Hug, Asianpunkboy, Phiiliip, and Hiroshi Sunairi, to name just a few, and it seems clear that some new, multifarious version of “gay art” is in formation, just in time for this post-criminal, premarital, passively resistant gay moment.
HOLLAND COTTER

Wispy Whistler and Caravaggio’s punk-angels! Yea!