lifestyle protections

Yuck.
So the Catholic Church was “fiercely lobbying” up to the last minute to defeat the modest, and decades-overdue, extension of the New York State Nondiscrimination Act (to include homosexuals and bisexuals).
It managed to pass yesterday, although minus any protection for the transgendered, and it was signed into law by the governor.
Yesterday’s short Daily News article doesn’t mention the notorious word, “lifestyle,” but it’s permanently etched in the minds of religious and conservative bigots, and in fact it’s the basis for their rejection of a good portion of humanity. Next time I or anyone else gets a chance to do some serious lobbying against state protection and encouragement of religion, something which actually is a lifestyle, I want to see the kind of consideration and protection that the Church always enjoys.

what a woman!

I had the privilege of watching New York City Councilmember Christine Quinn in action this afternoon.
Well, actually I admit she was only idling, compared to what she can do when warmed up and ready to open the throttle all the way. Today she was just in perfect tune with both her case and the venue. While she still blew away her colleagues and the witnesses before the committees with her intelligence and her focus, the real battle will be engaged in January.
The occasion this afternoon was a City Council joint meeting, in Council Chambers, of the Committees on Economic Development; Transportation; Waterfronts. The subject was, officially, “What the Olympic Games would mean for waterfront development, waterborne transportation, and waterfront habitats in New York City,” but until an hour and a half into the session, when Chris began to speak, it was basically a polite reception for a show-and-tell, or dog-and-pony show, by Daniel Doctoroff, a Deputy Mayor in the Giuliani administation and now founder and president of NYC2012, the committee charged with bringing the Olympics to New York City ten years from now.
The merits of a plan to bring the Olympics to New York City were not the subject of discussion today, but I was not made more comfortable with the idea by listening to Doctoroff start out by raving about his first soccer game experience during the recent World Cup games sited within our own borders, and especially when he exclaimed about how fantastic it was to be able to watch the teams “inject national fervor into the sport.” Um, I don’t think I’m the only one who doesn’t believe nationalism is or should be a standard for the sports experience, and it definitely was neither part of the ancient Olympic ideal nor that of those who resurrected it over a hundred years ago. I don’t have to even mention the horrors of soccer riots past and present around the world, all of which are the consequence of “national (or regional) fervor” and not of the spirit of the melting pot or of the Doctoroff’s organization’s description of New York, “The World’s Second Home.”
Anyway, the Doctoroff group’s plan includes covering over extensive railroad yard areas, a massive increase in the area of the Javits Convention Center and a giant new sports stadium, all of which would be located at the top of Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood and to the west and south of the Hell’s Kitchen neighborhood, both densely residential. Not incidently, that part of our Olympic bid will require a $2 Billion bond issue from the City of New York. Chris, who represents both districts, is opposed to the construction of a mammoth commercial sports stadium in the midst of a vulnerable residential community which hopes to escape the congestion and the junk which stadium areas attract. She was definitely the first speaker of the day to ask any probing questions of the well-rehearsed visiting Olympics boosters. On this the first of a number of hearing days however she was clearly holding back from a real confrontation with a plan so badly misconceived, if not just cynical.
She pointed out that the plan for what was clearly an invasive stadium in the midst of these neighborhoods was essentially driven by professional sports team interests and she corrected Doctoroff by pointing out that, outside of the rail track yard itself, the area to be affected is definitely a populous community and not a wasteland. She reminded us all that there are in fact already several community-based development plans, that were painstakingly developed over a period of many years, for the areas which would be affected and they do not include a commercial stadium, and finally she reached into her own experience of many years as an advocate in that part of the borough to assert that without a shadow of a doubt the community’s public transport problems definitely have never included the lack of a No. 7 subway line extension. Such a major extension constitutes the much balleyhooed key to the Olympic stadium plan, and the only part of the plan which would have to almost immediately if it is to be completed by the 2012 Olympics (which are still not a sure thing for the City).
In the end she asked what was in the plan for the West Side community; could it be reconciled with what that community really needs?
Doctoroff could basically only answer that his proposal sought to “change the neighborhood,” an answer which would only sound stupid, if not totally chilling, to those who already were a part of a real neighborhood.
There will be more hearings, and I intend to be there for the real sparks. The next one is scheduled for January 30 (time not yet announced), and anyone is free to speak. This one should be a blast.

this has got to mean war, and not the one Bush is talking

I’d rather see it fought on grounds even more essentially moral, but this one will definitely do.

As the Bush administration draws up plans to simplify the tax system, it is also refining arguments for why it may be necessary to shift more of the tax load onto lower-income workers.
Economists at the Treasury Department are drafting new ways to calculate the distribution of tax burdens among different income classes, which are expected to highlight what administration officials see as a rising tax burden on the rich and a declining burden on the poor.

Anyone out there think it’s not time to honor Jefferson’s maxim, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants”*? Ok, maybe we can avoid the blood, but only one side has been engaged in a class war up to now.
___________________
* Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Stephen Smith, November 13, 1787, in Albert Fried, Ed., The Essential Jefferson (Collier Books, 1963), p. 264.

“GOP neck is looking mighty red”

So reads the excellent headline on Stanley Crouch’s excellent column in today’s Daily News.
My favorite sentences, here pulled out separately from the whole:

What stands before the Republican Party, however, is something much deeper than the Day-Glo red in Brother Lott’s neck.
We have to remember that white Southerners were Democrats because the party of Lincoln had won the Civil War (which Lott has referred to as “the war of Northern aggression”).
After Johnson’s burst of civil rights legislation, the old-time religion of racism lost its power in Democratic Party circles, and reluctant ex-segregationists began to join up with the Republicans, who made them feel at home.
If the Republicans are not what white racists think they are, they need to raise their elephant bottoms up off the dime and get to work.
Long before his name was even mentioned as a presidential candidate, Bush told me in Texas that if the Republican Party did not expand itself beyond its white base, it would die. Though I doubt it, let us hope he was right.

Die. Yeah, die would be better for all of us.

protecting also those who need it most

The Daily News this morning printed my letter responding to a piece by their own editor, Jonathan Capehart, published last week. Capehart had suggested that Tom Duane was destroying the chances for enacting a state act protecting homosexuals because Duane wanted to include in the statute a category of people understood by very few others.

Just protections
Manhattan: In his Dec. 11 Opinion column, Jonathan Capehart wrote that he doesn’t understand why State Sen. Tom Duane is insisting upon the inclusion of the transgendered among those to be protected by the proposed state Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act. Could the answer be that Duane knows and understands who needs the protection most, and that is* not newspaper columnists and state senators?
James Arthur Wagner

*small syntax quibble: the last line above read “they are” but the News printed “is”
The letter has been edited down, and the published portion does not include these additional questions:

Could it also be that he understands that he serves an entire community, and that he believes that such service demands courage and not merely professional calculation? Unless he realy believes the stuff he writes, Mr. Capehart should be asking himself about courage and calculation. Would Mr. Capehart have suggested to Martin Luther King, Jr., forty years ago that the stuggle for civil rights could collapse if King did not limit his initial objective to securing protections for those blacks who were most white?

More exciting than the appearance of this letter is the fact that the paper decided to print a second letter on the very same subject today, this one also berating their conservative columnist.

Rights for all
Manhattan: State Sen. Tom Duane is right in trying to kill the Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act. The transgendered population should not be excluded from having the same protections under the law as other citizens. Transgendered might be a difficult concept for some to understand. That ignorance should not be justification for this discriminatory bill to pass.
Sean Labbe

____________________
BOX STORY:
If Pennsylvania has done it, New York should do no less.

A remarkable thing has happened in Pennsylvania.
The state legislature passed an amendment to the hate-crimes law that made Pennsylvania only the fifth state in the union to protect not only gays, lesbians, and bisexuals, but also those who are transgendered.
In a state renowned for its heartland conservatism, many people were stunned that the controversial bill, signed early this month by Gov. Schweiker, could triumph.

New York State, we need to be reminded, still has no law whatsoever protecting even lesbians and gays.

they’re all playing with fire in Venezuela

Following the unsuccesful American-backed military coup in Venezuela last April, when asked whether the Bush administration now recognizes Mr. Chávez as the nation’s legitimate president, one White House official replied, “He was democratically elected,” then added, “Legitimacy is something that is conferred not just by a majority of the voters, however.”
Yes, here in the U.S. we understand exactly what he meant, and this week Washington is saying it again. The Bush gang wants a change in the regime in Caracas as soon as possible, and is saying so publicly.
But are they out of their minds? Considering the motives and mindset in question, I shouldn’t bother asking. But what about everybody else: Venezuelans, South Americans, Americans not part of the U.S. ruling oligarchy, the rest of the world? Nicholas Kristof, writing from Caracas, thinks they’re all “playing with fire.”

The international community is playing a very dangerous game here in Venezuela, along with self-described democrats who are calling for military intervention. To consider what could go wrong, just look next door at Colombia, torn apart by civil war for half a century.
….
A Venezuelan journalist I met, Francisco Toro, is strongly against Mr. Chávez but also worries about the consequences of his removal. “In Colombia in 1948, the oligarchs assassinated [the populist leader Jorge] Gaitán,” Mr. Toro said, “because he represented a particular problem that they wanted to solve. They never dreamed that 54 years later, Colombia would still be in civil war. You know how something like this starts, but you don’t know how it ends.”

the Blue Button Project

Those who know me have seen the blue button I have been wearing for the past two months, and some already know what it means.
If you are still curious, or if anyone else reading this might be curious, please go to the Blue Button Project site, for the source, in art and conscience, of this emblem of resistance.
I always have extra buttons for those who will wear them.

and Mandela calls him a national hero!

The Guardian‘s series on AIDS has produced an excellent report on a great man.
The man is dying of AIDS, but he refuses to take the drugs that would keep him alive, until South Africa’s government makes them freely available to the poor.

Zackie Achmat is not hungry, but tucks into the chocolate cake just the same. South African Achmat is HIV positive, yet refuses to take the antiretroviral drugs that could prolong his life. But he does boost his immune system with protein – with chocolate cake.
Achmat is not a shanty dweller unable to afford the drugs; he is not a so-called “Aids dissident” who believes the drugs are poison; he is not mad, and he is not suicidal. Zackie Achmat, according to Nelson Mandela, is a national hero: an ordinary man whose extraordinary resolve could help save thousands of African lives, at the cost of his own.
At a reception in Johannesburg last week, South Africa’s former president turned to Achmat and asked him, with cameras rolling, to take the antiretrovirals. “Give me, as an old man, your promise that you will now take your medicine.” Not for the first time, the national hero, dressed as ever in T-shirt and jeans, said no.
A few days later, in a suburban Johannesburg garden, between mouthfuls of cake, he explains why. “It is a personal issue of conscience. I have become middle class but my brothers are working class, and if they were infected they could not afford the medicines.”
__________

For a closer and very personal look at AIDS and those living with AIDS, AIDS activism, South Africa, how the world works, and Zackie Achmat, head for the Gramercy Theatre tomorrow, saturday, for a 5:15 showing of Greg Bordowitz’s unforgetable film, “Habit.”

we hit the trifecta today!

Lott stays, for now, sorta hanging out there in the breeze for all to enjoy, neck in a noose; Kissinger drops out, deciding he can’t take the heat just yet, will wait for the fires of hell; and Cardinal Outlaw is down for the count after fleeing to his earthly holy father.
It’s been a great day, but there’s mountains of work left out there. The real Mr. Bigs are still standing, everywhere.