Alice Springs wants to veil Helmut Newton’s photos?

helmut-newton_campbell.jpeg
Helmut Newton Naomi Campbell, Cap d`Antibes 1998 c-print

I’m tempted to describe it as heroic, but Paddy would laugh at me. Art Fag City’s post brushing off frivolous claims of copyright infringement made by lawyers on behalf of Alice Springs, Helmut Newton‘s widow June, is spot-on.
And I’m not unacquainted with the discussion of photography and “fair use” myself, but AFC offers a full accounting of a real-life scenario, and help to all bloggers in the form of copies of documents and links, ending:

Kowtowing to wrongfull copyright infringement claims is a dangerous precident I�m not willing to set.

[image from artnet via AFC]

three wars

lynching.jpeg
Ken Gonzales-Day St. James Park 2006 6″ x 3.7″ [from his “Erased Lynching Series”]

I always talk about three wars when I refer to the martial abominations wrought by the outgoing administration, and I’m always asked, “Three?”. I answer that I’m considering the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq, but also the war on terror, which is clearly distinct from the first two, especially as we’ve been told it will it will go on forever. It’s the bogus war on terror for which it was considered necessary to suspend the Constitution and turn at least half of the citizenry into the enemy: suspected fellow-travelers, traitors or terrorists. But this is also the war in which, as we already know, U.S. government operatives and agencies have also been engaged for years in secret lynching operations around the world, as dramatized once again just today by this story: “Secret Order Lets U.S. Raid Al Qaeda in Many Countries

WASHINGTON (Reuters) � Since 2004, the Pentagon has used broad, secret authority to carry out about 12 attacks against al Qaeda and other militants in Syria, Pakistan and elsewhere, The New York Times reported on its Web site on Sunday.
Quoting what it said were more than six unnamed military and intelligence officials and senior Bush administration policy makers, the newspaper said the military operations were authorized by a classified order signed by former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld with the approval of President George W. Bush.
Under the order, the military had new authority to strike the al Qaeda network anywhere in the world and a broader mandate to conduct operations in countries not at war with the United States, according to the Times.

[image from kengonzalesday]

what they don’t want us to see in Iraq and Afghanistan

Yuri_Kozyrev_serial-numbers-population-movement-raq-2007-02.jpg
inside the gallery the caption reads: Yuri Kozyrev Iraq 2007 US forces mark Iraqis with serial numbers to track movements in and out of village

Jared_Moossy_american-soldier-afghanistan.jpg
inside the gallery the caption reads: Jared Moossy Afghanistan 2007 An [sic] wounded American soldier is airlifted by helicopter in eastern Afghanistan

I really, really would like to get away from what my grammar school teachers called “current events” and what I call “matters of life and death”, and go back to posting about the fine arts, but my intentions are being confounded by both events and the art. Yesterday, after visiting the group installation “The Ballot Show“, about you-know-what, at the Front Room Gallery in Williamsburg, I headed a little further west to the Sideshow Gallery’s “Battlespace: Unrealities of War“, and there I almost lost it.
These are images by 23 photographers “embedded” with our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Under the terms of their being allowed there they are forbidden to publish, in their regular commercial news outlets, the more violent images of injury and death hanging on the walls in this gallery. And so the wars go on, with the citizens who sustain them easily able to ignore the worst of what is being done in their name to both American troops and the “enemy”.
People elsewhere in the world don’t have this luxury; they’ve been shown such photographs since the wars began.
While in the gallery I couldn’t quite bring myself to photograph the most obscene images of mutilations and carnage. I cannot explain why, even to myself, especially since broadcasting them is precisely the intent of the photographers and the purpose of this installation.
I found the Battlespace site itself only a few minutes ago, so I’m using its images rather than my own, and, hoping to redeem myself for my timidity yesterday, I’ve decided to upload below one of the most powerful images I saw, one which I did not capture with my camera. I should add that it is not the most grotesque: This body was still living, and being attended by medical personnel.
Inside the gallery on Bedford Street the wounded soldier on the table appears almost, literally, “life size”. The scale in which it appears online can barely suggest the horror of what you are actually looking at.

Lucian_Read_american-soldier-ramadi-wounded-by-ied-iraq-2006.jpg
inside the gallery the caption reads: Lucian Read Iraq 2006 American soldier lies on an operating table in Ramadi after being wounded in an IED blast

Visit the exhibition itself before it closes next Sunday. You will never forget it.

[all images from Battlespace]

Obama’s change will require something like revolution

Obama_MSNBC.jpg

On election day at around 6:30 in the evening I drafted some thoughts that seemed to reflect my state of mind at the time. Barry and I were going to meet Paddy Johnson a little later at the election watch party at Huffington Post headquarters, where I had hoped to come up with an image to go with the draft post. But by the time Obama’s election was actually called, around 11 o’clock Eastern, I had tears in my eyes. I was home, and when I looked at my lines a little later I knew they just wouldn’t fly right then (unless you were asleep that night or brain dead, you know what I mean).
Like most of the world, I am overwhelmed and overjoyed by what has happened, even more so since I will admit that ever since 2000 I thought I’d never see another real Presidential election (even blogging about my scepticism, repeatedly, beginning almost seven years ago). I had seriously underestimated the Republicans incompetence in both their ability to govern and to maintain power.
But it’s now less than three days later and the questions have already begun.
Will Obama be be able to oversee our national restoration? My brother reminded me on the phone yesterday afternoon, from suburban D.C., of the price we had to pay to bring about this victory. We endured eight disastrous years of a Bush presidency, years which saw both the haughty ascendancy and the ignoble collapse of the unmourned Late Capitalist, Neoconservative and Republican regime. Nothing of importance or worth in our own Republic or in much of the rest of the world has escaped the depredations of its arrogance, its sententiousness, its dominion and its greed. I had believed for years that no fundamental political change would occur until we had sunk into a genuine economic depression, and I had gloomily predicted the change would be toward some form of Fascism.
I hadn’t anticipated the confluence of the dramatic events of the last year and the exceptional capabilities of Barack Hussein Obama. I’d say we were far luckier than we deserved to be. There was certainly no inevitability in the timing of either’s appearance.
But in order to rebuild institutions, restore well-being and a belief in the future, the new President will have to pull off something like a major revolution. And he’s going to have to move fast. Roosevelt’s entire “First New Deal” was proposed and passed by Congress within the first 100 days of his administration. I can’t imagine how he and his administration managed it, but in 1933 the people were demanding immediate relief.
Today there may not yet be universal recognition of the full impact of the current economic collapse. Only a few are beginning to describe it as equivalent to the Great Depression, whose ravages were well underway as FDR assumed office (although to be sure, our 32nd President didn’t also have to deal with two messy wars and Global Warming when he moved into the White House). Without that full recognition of the seriousness of our crisis, and with the continuing strength of contemporary skeptics, dinosaurs and reactionaries, including the fact that almost as many people didn’t vote for him as did, Obama will almost certainly have to push through what must be, and almost certain will be, an extremely progressive agenda while not making it look too radical, and he will have to do it in a way that will disarm and even enlist on its behalf as many of its potential adversaries as possible.
It was very interesting to me when I finally looked into it, that during his campaign Roosevelt had apparently spoken to the voters of nothing remotely related to what became his extraordinarily-ambitious New Deal programs; in fact, much of what he did say suggested an agenda quite the opposite of what was later framed and passed. Not knowing this then, but because I knew something about my countrymen, it did not surprise me when I heard nothing specific about any kind of new New Deal from Obama at any time during his own extended campaign.
Obama knows he will have to be diplomatically politic. The nation is fortunate that such an approach corresponds with his own temperament, and that he brings to the task an extremely sharp mind, including the ability to think and speak on his feet, and what appears to be enormous strength of character. I have no doubt that if anyone could pull this thing off in this shaken country at this time, Barack Obama could, but he won’t be able to do it alone.
I know there will be mistakes, as FDR made mistakes, but, and call me Pollyanna again, I believe he will pull it off, partly because of what I have just written, but also because he will have so much help (both enthusiastic and skilled), and because we have come to such a pass that we all really want to see him to succeed: Regardless of our diversity, and despite the vast range in our individual conditions and current fortunes, none of us can afford the cost of failure. We’ll have to be in there with him.
Did I mention the awesome and “monumental” importance that our success would signify, an importance even beyond that of our decision to make a man who happens to be [described as] Black the President of the United States? More than a material recovery, success would mean the restoration of the all-but-buried idea of a free and welcoming America first invented by a wise, older world sometime in the seventeenth century.

These are the tone-deaf, and surprisingly angry lines I wrote early Tuesday evening, exactly as I had left them*:

The corporate devisers and the engine of our national disaster and disgrace have finally been repudiated. Bush and his enablers will squirm in their Pennsylvania Avenue lair for almost three more months, where they can still do a lot of damage, but the lease is up.
While it is clearly a victory for reason and common sense and what used to be called “the American way”, today’s vote marks only the beginning of the real recovery.
We must all immediately get to work picking up the shattered pieces of a proud republic, and it won’t be easy. While we are doing so it will be equally as important to resolve and ensure that as the privileged and proud citizens of this fortunate land we will never again sell our heritage to slick con men who thrive by preying on our selfish appetites and ignorant fears.
We are a free people only if we remain actively and continuously responsible for our own governance.
Freedom ain’t a tower.

*
I’m struck by the fact that I totally ignored mentioning the significance of race when I wrote about what I already expected would be an Obama victory. I’d like to think that what looks like my indifference to its role may turn out to be a bellwether for this country finally arriving at maturity, but I can’t help mentioning that later that evening I noticed and remarked to my friends that sadly even the Huffington party presented little more than a handful of dark faces in a sea of white. I was regretting that we hadn’t decided to watch the unfolding wonders from somewhere in the streets.

[image is a still of the MSNBC broadcast as seen on our home screen]

NURTUREart benefit continues through the month

Vicki Sher_nurture benefit submission.jpeg
Vicki Sher untitled 2006 mixed media on cardboard 9″ x 12″

Earlier this week I wrote that I would announce it if NURTUREart were to continue to make art included in its 2008 Benefit available on line for those who were unable to be there last Monday, so here it is.
Barry had set up a mechanism some months back by which artists were able to furnish JPEGs to the Benefit’s curators. He’s now used it to make those which weren’t grabbed that night both visible around the world and easily purchased, so go to the site now and have fun: This way you get to search for more about the artists, and then order at leisure.
The image at the top is of one of the dozens of pieces now being shown on line, each available for the incredibly low price of $150, the same as they were that night. Although I’m familiar with and really like the artist’s work, and this particular piece, I’ve chosen Vicki Sher‘s drawing almost at random, to reflect the quality of the art you’ll see on the site.

[image provided by the artist, via NURTUREart]

The Walrus: Lennon, on peace . . . and change

I_Met_The_Walrus_war_machine.jpg
war machine [still from the video]

In 1969 14-year-old Jerry Levitan managed to get into John Lennon’s hotel room in Toronto’s King Edward Hotel with his reel-to-reel recorder where he interviewed his idol for the school paper. Nearly 40 years later Levitan produced an animated film documenting and illustrating what he heard and what he captured on tape in conversation with the Walrus that day.
A short excerpt of Lennon thrashing out war and change, from “I Met The Walrus“:

It’s up to the people . . . you can’t blame it on the gov’ment and say they’re doing it. Oh, they’re going to put us into war. We put them there. We allow it, you know, and we can change it; if we really want to change it we can change it.

“Walrus” was written and directed by Josh Raskin, with illustrations by James Braithwaite and Alex Kurina, and animation by Josh Raskin.

[image is a screen grab from YouTube, but I first heard about it today from scatteredsisters, a site maintained by a good friend in Antwerp together with her siblings dispersed about the globe]

Savannah flora

moss_on_oak.jpg
thistle_in_grass.jpg
ferns_in_wall.jpg

I found it very difficult last week to capture any particularly interesting shots of the many beautiful buildings in historic Savannah; I had more luck with the plants I encountered in our walks.
The first image above is of Spanish Moss hanging from the branches of one of the centuries-old Live Oaks on the grounds of the extraordinary Hofwyl-Broadfield Plantation south of the city along the Altamaha RIver. The second is of the base of a thistle plant which I saw there at the side of a path. The third is of an ancient rock wall below Factors Walk across from Factors Row back in the city.
The colors of these greens are true to life, even though I found it especially difficult to believe my eyes when I was standing by that wall at the bottom.

still Guantanamo

Guantanamo_32800t.jpg
arrest the real criminals!

Guantanamo.
Nobody has to spell it out again. We all know what it is, and what it represents. We know it should never have been built and we know that it should have been plowed under long ago.
We also know that no one is talking about it any more*.
Its victims remain inside, but it has been arranged that we can never know anything of their innocence or guilt. The only thing we can be sure of is the guilt of so many who are outside, those who built it, those who maintain it still, and all of us who tolerate it.

*
Well, almost no one. In a letter to the editor of the NYTimes published yesterday, Larry Cox, Executive Director of Amnesty International, acknowledges that while Bush has decided to do nothing about Guantanamo, in spite of saying more than two years ago that he wanted to close what I call our Cuban concentration camp, both major candidates are actually on record as saying that they would close it. However, Cox and many others smell the rat:

But they must not transfer the the violations to other locations [my italics]. Detainees should be charged with a recognizable criminal offense, brought to full and fair trial or released.
The next president must also commit to abandon the military commission trials, repudiate secret detention, never again authorize or tolerate torture, and uphold the rule of law at home and abroad.

But my question (and our guilt) remains: Why not now?

[image from Getty Images via Nasir Khan]