Rirkrit, where are you? or, artists have to eat too

Rose_Colored_Glasses_general.jpg
view of the gallery installation, with art suspended from bamboo poles and marine rigging in a reference to the innovative poles inside Peggy Guggenheim’s gallery, Art of This Century [Stephen Ellis’s 2000 untitled oil and alkyd canvas is in the center of the image; James Hyde’s new “Chunk Chair” sits below and behind it; Sherrie Levine’s “Untitled (after Henri Matisse)”, from 1985, hangs on the right; and a good bit of Tony Feher’s suspended bottles can be seen in the right foreground]

Rose_Colored_Glasses_skylight.jpg
view of dinner with, and below, the stars [Mateo Tannatt’s “GERALD@*BLUE ONION LATEO”, built for the project, performing as the round table for the evenings]

It was the darndest thing. The email was from “New York is Dead”, the subject line read “Rose Colored Glasses”, and the message was signed by Joe Montgomery and Jesse Willenbring. It was an invitation from two people whose names I didn’t recognize at the time, inviting me to participate in a “potluck dinner party group [designed to] show homage to Rirkrit Tiravanija and the breakthrough 1942 modern gallery, Art of This Century.
The evening suggested for my participation was described as one of the dinners they were holding at Gavin Brown’s Chelsea space during the first two weeks of February. The email went on to say they had curated a group show of artists but they were also attempting to assemble a group of 11 guests to eat together in the gallery on each of the 11 nights the show would be up. We were told there would be spectators, and that there would be no fourth wall. We were being encouraged to share food and conversation, “and not just about art”, for an entire evening, but other than being assigned a specific food theme (different for each evening) almost everything else would be up to our imagination.
It read as a pretty bold and ambitious concept, and I was immediately attracted to the references to art and food, but it was probably the connection with Brown, the bar Passerby and the evocation of Rirkrit and Peggy Guggenheim that pulled me in. I accepted the invitation, replying on my own and Barry’s behalf before I realized it had actually come just to me. I was embarrassed when I realized my presumption, but my hosts immediately made it clear that my dual rsvp was totally in order – if not actually a huge improvement over the specificity of the original invite.
Barry and I still thought we might be taking a chance, especially since we balance a pretty full calendar and are jealous of our time off, but it sounded just quirky enough for me to want to make the commitment which, as it happened, included a little work in the kitchen for me.
It turned out to be a delight. I brought my pot, . . . er, bowl, and it became one of the dishes served to the guests at an sculptural round wooden table constructed for our sit-down dinner. We met some great people (unfortunately a flu condition kept co-host Joe Montgomery from making it the night we were there). We saw some really good art imaginatively installed, and were totally charmed by the situation, by our fellow guests and by the generosity of our very-hardworking hosts.
For more on the concept and the experience, and images from the first night’s dinner, see the ArtForum Diary post.
There were works by almost three dozen artists surrounding us and at the table itself. What follows are images of just a sampling.

Red_Grooms_Peggy.jpg
Red Grooms Queen Peggy 2004 painted aluminum 45″ x 43″ x 32″ [detail of installation]

Charlotte_Beckett_Pit.jpg
Charlotte Beckett Pit 2008 black mylar, aluminum, motor [installation view]

Tony_Feher_water_bottles.jpg
Tony Feher Untitled 2008 60″ x 7″ x 4″ [large detail of installation]

John_Finneran_Nose.jpg
John Finneran Nose 2007 oil and stainless staples on aluminum 9″ x 7″

Nancy_Shaver_Fruit_Box_%231.jpg
Nancy Shaver Fruit Box #1 2005 cardboard box, paper-covered boxes 16″ x 22″ x 5″ [installation view]

A list (probably not totally complete) of artists included in the project’s environment whose work is not represented in any of the images would include Varda Caivano, Brian Calvin, Nancy de Holl, Aaron Freeman, Wolf Kahn, Jake Keeler, Alex Kwartler, Virginia Lee Smith, Joshua Light Show & Pig Light Show, Emily Mason, Carter Mull, Dominic Neitz, Jesse Pearson, Amanda Ross-Ho, Cary Smith, Jennifer West, Yuh-Shioh Wong, Betty Woodman and Michael Zahn.

but we do celebrate Valentine’s Day . . .

. . . and would like everyone else to be able to do the same

Justin_Marshall_Valentine_apron.jpeg
Justin Marshall Baby, I wanna make-out 2006 C-print

This was one of the works in the artist’s show in Chicago’s excellent Thomas Robertello Gallery last fall. Barry came across a different image by the artist from the same series, and had shown it to me. I looked at some of its mates and found this one, which managed to charm both of us on this special day.
An artist friend who is also an academic recently referred to our own collection as being at least partly “whimsical” in character. Whatever did she mean?

“No, no! Sentence first – verdict afterwards”

Alice_trial.jpg
Alice begins to doubt that justice really will be done.

And still they don’t get it.
I’m having trouble enough sleeping at night, thinking about the horrors routinely executed in our name around the world, but this headline to an AP story I saw on line last night looked particularly alarming:

Executions May Be Carried Out at Gitmo

Lewis Carroll is alive and well in America today; it’s just too bad for the knaves that not enough people are noticing.

[image from storynory]

“They hate our freedoms”

wiretapping.jpg
the enemy is us

“They hate our freedoms” [from Bush’s 2002 State of the Union address]

But just yesterday:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Senate overwhelmingly passed a bill on Tuesday granting retroactive immunity from lawsuits to telecommunications companies that took part in President George W. Bush’s warrantless eavesdropping program.
[The bill would replace a 15-day extension of a surveillance law which expires this week, a law whose provisions for the protection of privacy and personal freedoms the Bush administration and the companies have repeatedly, and avowedly, violated.]
The 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) requires that the government receive the approval of a secret FISA court to conduct surveillance in the United States of suspected foreign enemy targets.
But after September 11, Bush authorized warrantless surveillance of communications between people in the United States and others overseas if one had suspected terrorist ties [although in fact we do not know the full extent of the warrantless wiretapping program, or the extent to which FISA has been violated].

[image from ABC news]

Brian Belott at Canada last month

Brian_Belott_Trinity_Insurance_Sales_Blob.jpg
Brian Belott Trinity Insurance Sales Blob 2007 acrylic, glitter, foil, spray paint, oil marker, led clocks on plexi-glass in plastic frame 25.25″ x 38.5″ [installation view of diptych]

Brian_Belott_small_geometric_etc.jpg
Brian Belott Untitled (small geometric) 2007 glitter, foil, acrylic, spray paint, oil marker on plexi-glass in found frame 13″ x 11″ [installation view, with detail of artist’s idiosyncratic musical clothespin and key gallery garnish to the left]

Brian_Belott_Blue_Tin_Foil_Balls_Keyboard.jpg
Brian Belott Blue Tin Balls with Keyboard 2007 acrylic, glitter, foil, spray paint, oil marker on plexi-glass in metal frame 29″ x 26″

You won’t see these images if you head over to Canada now (unless they’ve somehow escaped getting picked up by savvy collectors, and in that case you might want to ask to see them). The show, Brian Belott‘s “Swirly Music“, was extended a week, making it possible for Barry and I to catch it, but it’s definitely gone now.
Three weeks later however these images are still swirling in my head, and that’s why I’m uploading them here today. They’ve waited long enough.
See Brent Burket, in the ArtCal Zine, for more on this seriously-whimsical show.

“In the Private Eye” at ISE Cultural Foundation

Anna_Von_Mertens.jpg
Anna Von Mertens Dawn (the first U.S. sighting of Sputnik October 6, 1957, Fairbanks, ALaska) 2008 hand-dyed, hand-stitched cotton 54″ x 100″ [installation view]

What a great show! The ISE Cultural Foudnation is currently hosting “In the Private Eye“, a group exhibition of six artists who, in the words of the press release:

. . . adopt an investigative approach to give form to matters that are either inherently obscured or altogether overwritten by time. Aided by modern technology that affords them unlimited access to information—they seek to unearth truths that illuminate various aspects of our current reality.

The curator is Yaelle Amir, and the experience of Barry and I with the show, “Quote Unquote“, she curated at NURTUREart last fall was probably the big draw for both of us. We also already knew enough about some of the artists at the ISE installation to bring us south of Houston this past Friday anyway. We were deeply disappointed we had to miss a performance by Nin Brudermann scheduled for that evening, especially after brushing up against some of its drama during a rehearsal that afternoon.
Nin Brudermann, Carlos Motta, Trevor Paglen, Dannielle Tegeder, Anna Von Mertens, and Amy Westpfahl are the artists. All of the work is very good, all of it is hot button, and all of it is very beautiful. Even beyond that, it seems my camera thought the two “quilts” of Anna Von Mertens were also exquisite simply as objects, and I quickly found myself lost in the stars. One of these hangings just had to end up here.

yes, of course we torture

Waterboarding-Definition-Wikipedia24dec05a.jpg

We do torture. The whole world knows it, and even in the land of the brave and the free and the righteous none of us needed to wait for the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights or anyone anyone else to tell us what we all know already.

Waterboarding should be prosecuted as torture: U.N.
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) – The controversial interrogation technique known as waterboarding and used by the United States qualifies as torture, the U.N. human rights chief said on Friday.

Why do we do torture? Because we want to, and because we can. And by the way, ordinary Americans have repeatedly shown they’re okay with it, or it wouldn’t continue today.

[image from Wikipedia via mindfully.org]

WAGMAG benefit at The Front Room tomorrow

Philip_Simmons_High_Noon_study.jpg
Philip Simmons’s “Study for High Noon”, one of the works included in tomorrow’s benefit

Barry and I both love art, Williamsburg and Greenpoint, Williamsburg and Greenpoint artists, Williamsburg and Greenpoint galleries, and WAGMAG, that invaluable guide to Williamsburg and Greenpoint galleries.
But like most of the best arts institutions (where “non-profit” is always an understatement) WAGMAG can’t survive on its virtues alone. Once a year the rest of us have a chance to help fund it. At the annual benefit (this year is the third) we can feel very good about ourselves, party with some terrific people, and then go home with some exciting art – created by some of our favorite friends and neighbors.
Oh, and I can’t say enough about Daniel Aycock, the generous artist host.
DETAILS:

tomorrow, February 8
at The Front Room
147 Roebling St. (corner of Roebling & Metropolitan)
admission is free
but tickets for artwork drawing are $150 (purchase at the gallery or online)
final viewing tomorrow from 1-6 (or on line)

We stopped by several days ago to see the work which had already come in, and now we’re definitely psyched.

Guantanamo: is there no limit to the obscenities?

Guantanamo.jpg
a view of the camp we’ve known about for six years, not the secret one

Really?!!!
We learn tonight that the regime in Washington has been maintaining a separate concentrated concentration camp totally hidden inside the Guantanamo camp we already knew about, a concentration camp which had already been created and maintained, with the explicit or tacit support and approval of members of both parties, outside of any legal system existing anywhere on the planet.
Even now, a year and a half after the last Congressional election, the Democratic majority hasn’t been able to bring itself to talk about even the original camp. Please tell me once gain about the genius of the vaunted two-party system which is supposed to promote liberty and justice for all.

[image by Carlotta Gall and Andy Worthington from the NYTimes]

“At Arms Length” at NURTUREart

Cody_Trepte_neuroses.jpg
Cody Trepte This is how I cope with my neuroses 2004 cross-stitch 6.5″ x 6.5″

1.%20Guy%20Ambrosino_Abu%20Ghraib%201.jpg
Guy Ambrosino Abu Ghraib #1 2006 watercolor 14″ x 10″
Guy_Ambrosino_printed_text.jpg
[detail showing artist’s text]

NURTUREart has been mounting some great shows lately, and “At Arm’s Length“, which closes next Sunday, is one of the best.
This creative non-profit institution is as stimulating as it is, well . . . , yes, nurturing to artists, curators, and the public beyond. Its directors have assembled a remarkable curatorial program mechanism which was described to us only yesterday afternoon. Judging from what Barry and I have been seeing in their gallery space lately, it’s really working.
The current show, curated by Lauren Schell Dickens and Julie McKim, was assembled around the idea of the reintroduction of the hand in creative work, in opposition to its increasing displacement within the arts as in most of contemporary life. The exhibition’s excellent small brochure describes it further:

With laborious and time-consuming manual processses perfprmed over and over, [the seven artists included in the show] obsessively attempt to bring experience back within arms reach.

Each of these works included is as beautiful as it is intellectually engaging.
Cody Trepte‘s last show was inspired by the mathematical genius Alan Turing, which helps explain why I can’t describe what he’s doing here in a few words. No, it’s about much more than needlepoint.
There isn’t a weak spot in the roster of seven artists, which includes Molly Springfield, David A Faust, Christina Christina Gundersen, Helen Dennis, Jessica Mein and Guy Ambrosino.
They’re all very good, but Ambrosino’s contribution introduces a “political” element into this excellent company (can we survive a world in which we have reduced torture to merely a political topic?) and his treatment, in elegant watercolors, of four monstrous, excruciatingly-familiar photo images with a rare balance of grace and rage serves both the art and the show particularly well.

[image of Ambrosino’s piece from NurtureART]