why was Craig taken down and Vitter not?

Toles_Marriage.gif
(but right, even laudable, if I paid women for quickies)

The Republicans have trashed and now unceremoniously sacked one of their very own worthy gentlemen for soliciting consensual, uncompensated sex with another person. Senator Craig was forced to resign only days after his sensational misstep (with another man) was reported in the media.
A year ago another model Republican, Representative Mark Foley, was hounded out of office for a peccadillo even less “awful” than that committed by the married-with-three-children Senator from Idaho. Foley, an unmarried man, sent suggestive emails and sexually explicit instant messages to young adult men who had formerly served or were at the time serving as Congressional pages.
A third Republican luminary, Senator David Vitter, admitted early in July to regularly soliciting the services of a female prostitute. There has been no investigation and no movement to oust Vitter from his elected position or party responsibilities, and in fact on his return to the senate floor later in the month Vitter was greeted with a standing ovation by his Republican peers.
Why is there such a difference in the way their colleagues treated these three members of Congress? Craig and Foley happened to be of what their former friends would call the homosexual “persuasion” but Vitter seems to be fixated on the role of lusty heterosexual.
Oh, there is the thing about the toilet venue of Craig’s ruinous flirtation (Americans are obsessed with potties – all potties) and also the extraordinarily-significant fact that should Vitter resign his seat it would be filled by a Democrat named by the Democratic governor of Louisiana. Unfortunately for Craig the Governor of Idaho is a Republican. Foley’s was an interesting case: It suggests that here the Republicans’ sincere bigotry might have gotten the better of them since their hand-picked candidate to replace the homo failed to make it in the election which followed his resignation. Of course it could also have been the product of an excessive self-confidence, one which wouldn’t have survived the last year of spiraling Republican disasters.
Of course I’m not going to contrast any of this with the Democrat’s treatment of Jerry Studds and Barney Frank [neither lost his job], the Republican attitude toward Presidential sex, or toward Congressional corruption involving real crimes with real victims. And while I’m not speaking of real victims, I’m not going to speak about the real, countless, world-wide victims of the first eight and one half years of this Republican administration.
“Hypocrisy” is far too mild a word for this stuff.

[image by Tom Toles via Washington Post]

the real meaning of Labor Day [redux]

Pullman_strike_guard_harpers.jpg
National Guardsmen firing into demonstrators during the 1894 Chicago Pullman strike* [contemporary Harpers Weekly drawing]

[Exactly five years ago today (I see now that it was almost to the minute) I did a post, “the real meaning of Labor Day“. I think it’s time to do it again. My own brief text was augmented with quotes from the site of Jim Lehrer’s PBS show, NewsHour, a page which had appeared the year before. This year I’ve added an image.]
It’s not the barbeque, and it’s certainly not the traffic. It was born as an attempt to appease the working people of America. [Remember the Pullman strike in history class?] Unfortunately it seems to have worked too well.

The observance of Labor Day began over 100 years ago. Conceived by America’s labor unions as a testament to their cause, the legislation sanctioning the holiday was shepherded through Congress amid labor unrest and signed by President Grover Cleveland as a reluctant election-year compromise.

Soon after, when the entire nation became thoroughly frightened by the bugbear of socialism and communism, the movement was de-radicalized. The real Left was gradually marginalized and almost totally eliminated from American culture and society. The workers’ movement itself became middle class, before it acquired the material benefits and political power which that adjustment should have delivered. And there it languishes.

In 1898, Samuel Gompers, head of the American Federation of Labor, called it “the day for which the toilers in past centuries looked forward, when their rights and their wrongs would be discussed…that the workers of our day may not only lay down their tools of labor for a holiday, but upon which they may touch shoulders in marching phalanx and feel the stronger for it.”
Almost a century since Gompers spoke those words, though, Labor Day is seen as the last long weekend of summer rather than a day for political organizing. In 1995, less than 15 percent of American workers belonged to unions, down from a high in the 1950’s of nearly 50 percent, though nearly all have benefited from the victories of the Labor movement.

Happy Labor Day, but don’t forget.

*
I haven’t been able to find a really good compact summary of the strike anywhere on line, although there is this setting of the broader context in a discussion from Howard Zinn. I would definitely welcome any other suggestions. I can however offer information on some of the numbers involved in the physical conflict itself, quoted here from the Kansas Heritage Group:

The total forces of the strikebreakers both government and private were [against 100,000 strikers]: 1,936 federal troops, 4,000 national guardsmen, about 5,000 extra deputy marshals, 250 extra deputy sheriffs, and the 3,000 policemen in Chicago for a total of 14,186 strikebreakers. In addition to these figures there were also twelve people shot and killed, and 71 people who were arrested and sentenced on the federal indictment.

No picnic.

[image from Wikimedia Commons}

“surge working” – surprise!

Gros_Antoine-Jean_Abukir.jpg
Antoine-Jean Gros “Battle of Abukir” 1806
but it never, ever looks like this

“Petraeus says Iraq ‘surge’ working” (headline of lead Reuters story on Yahoo!)
Do they think we have a hundred years to work on it? Do they think we’re actually going to be able to stay? Do they actually expect we can establish any order whatsoever? Is our order their order? Under what mandate are we going to continue to occupy and terrorize another people? Have they any idea how these things always turn out? Do they know this is a grotesque imperialism, regardless of what they choose to call it this time around? Can we, and can the rest of the world, afford the luxury of our deceit, our mistakes, our illusions?
Don’t they realize we know their speeches by heart?

Leopold’s Congo (1885-1908)
French Indo-China (1887-1954)
Portuguese Angola (1486-1975)
Italian East Africa (1936-1942)
British South Africa (1795-1961)
American Phillipines (1899-1946)
Soviet Afghanistan (1979-1988)
Chinese Tibet (1950-?)
Japanese Nanjing (1937-1945)
Japanese Manchukuo (1932–1945)
German eastern Reich (1938-1945)
French North Africa (1830-1962)
Ottoman southeastern Europe (1453-1919)
British Ireland (1171-1921-?)
Spanish Netherlands (1579-1713)
Russian empire (1654-1991-?)
United States empire (?-1898-?)

[image from allthingsbeautiful]

I love science!

bee_pollen_fossil.jpg

A piece of amber 15 to 20 million years old, found in the Dominican Republic, contains a perfectly-preserved bee within it. The news seems to be all about the fossilized orchid pollen on the insect’s back, and how it demonstrates that orchids were around during the age of the dinosour, but for me the wonder begins with the integrity and beauty of the carcass of this incredibly ancient worker bee; it would look as good had it been alive until a few minutes ago. It’s also interesting to think about how much better this gal is doing than any of those Pharohs who were buried, what, a couple seconds ago?
For the science geeks, the biologists tell us that although the pollen and its carrier are only 15 to 20 million years old, they were able to use their examination of the pollen and a molecular-clock analysis to estimate the age of the orchid family, which they date to about 80 million years ago, some 15 million years before the extinction of the dinosaurs. Okay, that’s pretty cool too.
No wiggle room for the creationists there.
CORRECTION: I’ve been reminded [see comment] that worker bees are in fact female; I have accordingly corrected a noun used in the text above. My apologies and my respects to a very long line of exquisite creatures.

[image of Santiago Ramirez from Reuters via the Globe and Mail]

“war on terrorism” is new McCarthyism: Gibran victim

Red_scare_1917.jpg
we have a history

Except to most of the poor citizen infantry of every description and every station which it has been enlisting for six years, the so-called “war on terror” has always been fundamentally about controlling the powerless – and sustaining the power of the powerful.
By 2001, after almost a century of the political and social distortions and perversions committed in the name of fighting what ordinary folk were told was their enemy both outside the country and in their midst, the dreaded “Red Terror” had melted away. The lies which had succeeded in destroying the American Left had to be remodeled. A new devil had to be invented. And surprise! The Arab/Muslim world, the new monolithic (conceptualized) enemy, showed up on our doorsteps just in time.
Fifty years ago Senator Joseph McCarthy had shown us exactly how to go about fighting our imaginary devils. Some New Yorkers seem to have taken their cues directly from the American witchhunt which managed to silence or send into exile, among so many others, Charlie Chaplin, W.E.B. DuBois, Clifford Odets, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Paul Robeson, Bertholt Brecht, Hans Eisler and Pete Seeger.
You’d think that after 230 years what is now the strongest and richest nation in the world might finally be able to stand up for its professed principles and stop crippling itself in regular paroxysms of fear about real or imagined enemies allegedly capable of undoing us all.
I’ve wanted to write something on this story since it first broke, but what I knew about its complexity discouraged me from trying to do so in any compact form. Maybe the controversy about a school’s conception and the form it was to assume had to be separated from what happened afterward.
Today the NYTimes carries a column on the Education page by Samuel C. Freedman, Columbia professor of journalism, which manages to assemble the basic facts and calmly describe the enormously-important issues involved. It’s an appalling story of a distinguished teacher and social activist being defamed and peremptorily removed from a public post because of a racist, cultist and nativist stupidity and hysteria driven by media and political operatives and bosses representing the most shameful political opportunism, or deliberate calculation.
And remember this is in the multicultural, polyglot, ethnic cornucopia of New York City. From Freedman’s piece in the Times:

�I hope it burns to the ground just like the towers did with all the students inside including school officials as well,� wrote an unidentified blogger on the Web site Modern Tribalist, a hub of anti-immigrant sentiment. A contributor identified as Dave responded, �Now Muslims will be able to learn how to become terrorists without leaving New York City.�
Not to be outdone, the conservative Web site Political Dishonesty carried this commentary on Feb. 14:
�Just think, instead of jocks, cheerleaders and nerds, there�s going to be the Taliban hanging out on the history hall, Al Qaeda hanging out by the gym, and Palestinians hanging out in the science labs. Hamas and Hezbollah studies will be the prerequisite classes for an Iranian physics. Maybe in gym they�ll learn how to wire their bomb vests and they�ll convert the football field to a terrorist training camp.�
Thus commenced the smear campaign against the Khalil Gibran International Academy and, specifically, Debbie Almontaser. For the next six months, from blogs to talk shows to cable networks to the right-wing press, the hysteria and hatred never ceased. Regrettably, it worked.
Ms. Almontaser resigned as principal earlier this month.

The school is designed to be entirely secular. It is named for a Lebanese-born Christian poet and visual artist who lived in New York. Eventually it is to include the sixth through twelfth grades, offering classes such as math and science in both Arabic and English. The academy will be one of more than 60 existing dual-language city schools teaching in languages such as Russian, Spanish and Chinese. The new principal unfortunately does not speak Arabic, but the fact that she is a Jew rather than an Arab might not have been a problem for the school’s cosmopolitan namesake.

For a richer perspective read this excellent narrative from Steve Quester, a New York educator, activist and friend of mine, who is familiar with Almontaser’s work.
There’s also an excellent piece, “Jewish Shootout Over Arab School“, in The Jewish Week, from which I have excerpted a section describing Almontaser’s place in the larger community and the dismay of one wise and compassionate Jew concerned about what the incident will mean to his own community as well as that of New York City and even the nation as a whole:

Almontaser, a public school teacher and administrator, was born in Yemen but immigrated here when she was three. Since 9/11, the slight woman in a hijab had emerged as a prominent advocate in the Muslim community for reaching out and working with other faiths. After the attacks her son, an Army Reserve officer, served as a rescue worker at Ground Zero.
Among other things, Almontaser had invited hundreds of Jews and Christians to her own home in the wake of the terrorist attack to help defang fear and anger towards Muslims. She had joined social action groups, such as We Are All Brooklyn, an inter-ethnic initiative supported by JCRC [the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater New York], to combat hate crimes in the dense, mixed neighborhoods of that borough. She had trained with ADL�s anti-bias program, A World of Difference, to become a better facilitator for diversity training and inter-group dynamics in the public schools.
Rabbi [Michael] Paley, a scholar-in-residence with UJA-Federation, warned that the prominent role played by a faction within the Jewish community in the attack on her would �come back and bite us. This begins to destroy the America that’s been so good to us.� Rabbi Paley, who has met Almontaser during interfaith activities, emphasized that in his remarks on this issue he was speaking only for himself and not his organization.
�The most important thing to know about the Muslim community here is that it replicates the Jewish community from many years ago,� he said. �These are people trying to become Americans as hard as they can, and also trying hard not to lose their identity, just as groups before them did.
�The idea that unless they pass an acid test � that Muslims are terrorists until proven innocent � will mean that none will pass. We are ultimately blocking them from becoming American,� he warned. The result, he said, would be an Arab immigrant community more isolated and less assimilated, �like the Arabs in France.� [my italics]
The message to the Arab-American community as a result of this debacle was, �You�re a fool to think they�ll accept you,� he said.

[image of James Pinckney Alley from Assumption College]

new ArtCal launched

ArtCal_screen.jpg

As the chief says, “we’re still working on a few features and tweaking the design”, but the new ArtCal site is now live. By next week at this time, with the opening of New York’s vigorous fall gallery season, the nearly three-year-old site will be displaying more shows than ever before, but sorting them out will be easier than ever before. Some additional features have been added, and there will be more to come.
Go see for yourself.
The clean design is by Michael Mandiberg.

cop sitting in toilet stall enticed Senator Craig for sex

Roman_Public_Toilets_Ostia.jpg
ruins of public toilet in ancient port of Ostia

Okay, even if no one has asked, does anyone want to know my take on the Senator Craig homosex arrest story? Well, it was actually my second thought, the less-than-honorable gentleman being a Republican, but it became paramount a few seconds after I began to read the arresting officer’s account of the incident in Roll Call, the capitol Hill newspaper.
I think it’s called “entrapment” when it happens to the people we think of as the good guys.
Isn’t anyone else out there concerned about the fact that police officers in Minneapolis are being paid to sit inside airport bathroom stalls to trap guys interested in getting off?

[image from darkcreek]

“Office Party” at Participant Rental temp space

LovettCodagnone_work_play
Lovett/Codagnone All Work No Play 2007 vinyl lettering and mirror [installation view with detail reflection of two bloggers]

Barry and I were both very happy to be able to get to a Participant show this summer, since the gallery had to abandon its previous home on Rivington Street earlier this year. “Office Party” was the title of the gallery’s very cool installation in its temporary quarters at Rental [check the link for press on the gallery itself and the press release for “Office Party”]. The show closed August 19, but we’re hoping to hear soon about the new permanent address of this vital Downtown non-profit space.
The artists represented this summer, all addressing the idea of work or workplace, were Eric Heist, Lovett/Codagnone. DIana Punter, and Børre Sæthre. In the project room there were additional pieces on the theme by Stephen Andrews, Matthew Antezzo, Michel Auder, Lutz Bacher, Robert Boyd, Kathe Burkhart, Robin Graubard, Michael Lazarus, Virgil Marti, Laura Parnes, Luther Price, Adam Putnam, and Shellburne Thurber.

The gallery concept represented by Rental, now in both Los Angeles and New York, is an interesting and one welcome on both coasts. It helps to answer a genuine need for broadcasting the work of emerging artists in new milieaux, one which is almost never addressed otherwise.
This is Roberta Smith writing in the NYTimes May 25:

Rental, the latest addition to the expanding Lower East Side gallery scene, is the first one to have the light and views — if not the interior design — of a Chelsea space, thanks to its location on the sixth floor of a corner building with big windows. But that is not its distinguishing characteristic: true to its name, and like its predecessor in Los Angeles, Rental is for rent to selected out-of-town dealers. The first Rental was founded in 2005 by Daniel Hug and Joel Mesler; the New York version has been set up by Mr. Mesler.
This could unsettle the gallery scene’s home-away balance of power in interesting ways. Dealers who give artists their first shows elsewhere will not necessarily have to hand them over to New York galleries to obtain exposure here. They can do the work, walk the walk and talk the spiel themselves.