raw NYPD brutality, spawned by Kelly, Bloomberg and Quinn

RHA-1.jpg
RHA_2.jpg
RHA_3.jpg
RHA_4.jpg
stills captured from video on NYCindymedia site

On Thursday I wrote about a demonstration in which I had participated (put together by The Radical Homosexual Agenda [RHA], Assemble for Rights NYC, and other groups and individuals), which was directed against Council Speaker Quinn’s support of newly-adopted NYPD regulations restricting the right of assembly. I included in that entry a dozen or so still pictures I had taken.
They weren’t enough to tell me about the full measure and shape of the violence I witnessed that afternoon. Last night I saw this footage of the Glass Bead Collective and Time’s Up! Video Collective documenting the most violent images of Police aggression I’ve witnessed in almost twenty years of street activism.
Go to this NYC indymedia page and click onto the link under the heading, “Video Footage showing aggressive arrests by NYPD during the peacefull parade”. Note that the video is composed of segments from several cameras, so there is more than a single presentation of some scenes.
It was already clear to anyone who hasn’t tried to avoid thinking about the quality of civic life in New York that this city’s police ranks and leadership are both out of control and a physical and Constitutional threat to its citizens, and not just those seen by “the finest” as “the other”, so this footage should not come as a revelation to any of us. But the problem neither begins nor ends with the failures of the uniforms on the street. Our appointed and elected representatives and municipal executives, far from fulfilling their responsibility to police the police, continue to aid and abet their crimes and outrages. Officials are content with a ritual mourning of the dead and arranging photo opportunities with the survivors, visiting the homes and attending the funerals of their prey – while paying tens of millions of dollars of our public treasury in court awards to the growing number of victims of police and government brutality.
Chief of Police Kelly is dead wrong about his so-called “parade rules”, the Mayor Bloomberg knows it and the best I can say about the Speaker of the City Council on this issue (she is also my local representative) is that Chris Quinn appears to have a tin ear on First Amendment issues. Our rights and freedoms to speak and assemble are not subject to political negotiation, the convenience of our law enforcement officials (or their macho “control” neuroses), the swift traffic (and free street storage) of private automobiles, or our politicians’ ambitions for higher office.
For a long time I lulled myself into thinking I could continue to distinguish between what has been happening in the country at large and what is going down here in the land I call home, but today I realize I can only be thankful that New York doesn’t have a foreign policy and weapons of mass destruction.

[images from Glass Bead Collective and Time’s Up! Video Collective via NYCindymedia]

police “control” un-permitted parade protesting Quinn

Quinn_Stonewall_2.jpg

I survived this afternoon’s “Parade Without a Permit” more or less unscathed, although I was pushed to the ground while photographing the police exercising their “control” of our right to free speech.
At the start of the parade in City Hall Park there were, by Norm Siegel‘s semi-official count, 54 demonstrators (plus a large contingent of members of the alternative media, and various support people and legal observers), making the assemblage an official “un-permitted parade” according to new NYPD rules, which allow only up to 49 people if no police permit has been granted.
At no time was there a crime in progress; we presented no threat to anyone. There was not even a hint of a misdemeanor, yet the Department, our servants, not content with a melodramatic presence made up of officers and inspectors, many in plainclothes, a scooter contingent and several police vans, decided to do some pushing around.
The pushing began with repeated orders, rude shouts in fact, to keep our feet on the sidewalk at all times, even when it was narrowed or blocked by subway entrances and construction sheds. In the end it appeared to be problems with the obstruction and tunnel darkness of a large shed on the west side of Church Street, complicated by the many bags of debris stacked underneath, which elevated the pushing to the physical level. The police seemed to be unhappy with the speed with which we were clearing the street for the important people who use cars.
I assume that any attempt to point out to the officers that their own combined body mass and the bulk of their own vehicles added up to a much bigger traffic obstruction than did the presence of our little band would have fallen on deaf ears.
One verbal exchange led to another, and then the pushing began (from them on us) without any further warning. Before I could get away from the center of the melee I found myself on the pavement. I snapped a few (not very interesting) pictures from that dramatic vantage point and when I scrambled back to my feet I saw that at least two people had been taken into the middle of the street where they were on the ground. Surrounded by their banners, flags and leaflets, they were handcuffed and carried away.
The struggle for New York City’s recognition of the First Amendment will certainly continue, but for tonight we have these beautiful battle ribbons:

Quinn_1.jpg
Quinn_2.jpg
Quinn_3.jpg
Quinn_4.jpg
Quinn_5.jpg
Quinn_6.jpg
Quinn_7.jpg
Quinn_8.jpg
Quinn_9.jpg
Quinn_10.jpg
Quinn_11.jpg
Quinn_0.jpg

related sites:
The Radical Homosexual Agenda
Assemble for Rights NYC
NYC indymedia
Transportation Alternatives
TIME’S UP!
Association of the Bar of the City of New York
Critical Mass
Five Borough Bicycle Club

terrorist gets bail

cubana_victims.jpg
detail of a temporary memorial to the 72 victims of Cubana de Aviación flight 455, erected outside the courthouse in El Paso in 2005

ADDENDUM: [April 21] “A Terrorist Goes Free

Terrorist Luis Posada Carriles, wanted in Cuba and Venezuela [but not in the United States] for the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner that killed 73 people was released on bail in New Mexico today. He has been held in the U.S. on immigration charges since 1975 and will theoretically be in El Paso for a trial which is scheduled to finally begin May 11.
Posada Carriles was trained by the CIA and has ties to the Bush family.

[image from narcosphere]

Radical Homosexual Agenda [RHA] “un-permitted parade”

pier57fence.jpg
pier57inside.jpg
“keeping control” (wire and flesh, inside a holding pen during the 2004 RNC)

No, Chris, in America the police are not supposed to write the laws and “control” demonstrations.
Yesterday morning on the Brian Lehrer show NY City Council Speaker Christine Quinn responded to a question from the host about her support of new NYPD regulations on “parade permitting”. The regulations dramatically restrict the public’s Constitutional rights of speech and assembly.
The NYPD will now require a permit for any public gathering, or “parade”, of 50 people or more. Section 1A of the city ruling defines a parade as “any march, motorcade, caravan, promenade, foot, or bicycle race, or similar event of any kind, procession or race which consists of a recognizable group of 50 or more pedestrians, vehicles, bicycles, or other devices move by human power, or ridden or herded animals proceeding together upon any public street or roadway.”
On the Lehrer show Quinn stated emphatically that she believes the new regulations are “fair and appropriate” and “allow people to express their First Amendment rights”, but it is clear to anyone concerned with exercising these rights that the police get to decide how and when and with whom they may do it.
I was shocked to hear the Speaker’s concluding expression of support for our uniformed enforcers: She stated that the police must have the ability to “keep control of situations” [my emphasis].
I’ve known Quinn for many years and I have spoken and written highly of her in the past, and I expect to be able to do so in the future, but it is clear to me that on this extremely important issue Quinn is just wrong. She really has “turned her back on civil rights”, in the words of The Radical Homosexual Agenda [RHA], the organizers of a demonstration at City Hall tomorrow afternoon at 4 o’clock.
Of course this is not about queers alone; political activists and alternative transportation advocates have been impacted by NYC police attitudes in the most dramatic manner in recent years, but the issue belongs to everyone who wishes to breathe free. The Council Speaker is an out lesbian with a background of community oranization and a family history of activism who has participated in demonstrations herself; she should know better.
The demonstration is certain to include more than 50 people. Not surprisingly, there will be no permit.
Almost certainly the most important event in New York this week, the “Parade Without a Permit”, will take place at City Hall tomorrow, Thursday, at 4 pm.

[images from indymedia, by anonymous, and included in my September 3, 2004 entry]

benefit performances: The Civilians tonight, 13P on April 29

Civilians_Save_This_City.jpg
a new musical based on Colorado Springs, Ted Haggard, the evangelical movement, and US

I’ve been a little tardy in announcing two affordable benefits for performing arts groups that interest Barry and myself. I’m especially late with my The Civilians plug, as their show goes off tonight, but sometimes a last-minute notice can be as effective as any other, and there’s still time to celebrate with this very sharp group.
Artistic Director Steve Cosson describes a bit of the origins of the group’s work-in-progress, “Save This City!”:

Three of us came out in June and went to New Life and I think the first time we really sort of got it, like “Oh! this really seems to be the center of America right now. I mean, you’re in the middle of this church with 7,000 people and the minister is talking about his relationship to George Bush and Ariel Sharon and other world leaders. I think the world we come from knows that the evangelical movement is this big influential thing in politics, but they don’t really have an understanding of the scope of it or what it means, or what that kind of Christianity really means, or what it is beyond its political effect on the national elections. And other than that they find it kind of scary and freaky.

Tonight’s performance will include members of the company perfoming songs from the new show.
Jump here for a quick look at the 2005 benefit.

The independent playwright organization 13P is also having a cabaret benefit, eleven days from now, at Joe’s Pub on April 29th. See their website for more details.

[image from newspeakblog, via The Civilians]

Christopher Lowry Johnson at Winkleman

Johnson_Christopher_Platfor.jpg
Christopher Lowry Johnson Platform 2007 oil on canvas 66″ x 78″ [large detail of installation]
Johnson_Christopher_Platf_d.jpg
[detail]

This is not a walk-thru show. Actually, this is probably true for most painting shows (at least those where the gallerist/curator has any creds at all), but this one is even more special. It seems quite muted at first, but given a little time, its rewards are great.
Christopher Lowry Johnson has an exhibition of his latest work at Winkleman in a show titled “Chorus”, his third solo turn at the gallery. The show closes on Saturday.
I recently walked into the space at the end of a long afternoon of gallery visits and sat down on the bench in the middle [yes, a bench in a gallery – a bench, how extraordinary, and how helpful for both visitor and art!]. I stared at the large, very white-ish, canvas across from me, expecting to work with it only as a beautiful, complex abstraction. I had been immediately attracted to its drama and beauty as I walked in, before I knew anything or saw very much, but then something happened. As I sat looking at this canvas its impenetrable layers of oil opened a wonderful, very grand window on images both abstract and concrete, a world undetectable at first or even second glance.
The remaining works, although much less abstract, are no less beautiful or profound in their impact. Johnson’s technical skills are matched by what seems to me to be an extraordinary appreciation of history, and no less the history of painting itself.
Oh yes, while Barry and I were there on Saturday, one of New York’s best art critics slipped into the gallery, but sadly stayed only a minute or so. I think it was a mistake, and a loss for scads of readers.
In any event, if you can make it to West 27 Street in the next few days, you might want to do so, especially since it was impossible to get a decent photograph of the work, and “Platform” in particular.
I’m ambivalent about relying on statements and press releases for an appreciation of work generally, so I tend to read them rather lightly, and usually only when baffled or feeling in need of what I call the “instructions” supplied by a gallery or museum. In this case the two-paragraph text supplied on the gallery site can provide a very useful jumping-off point, although I confess I was fortunate to get some insight directly from the owner/director Ed Winkleman himself. Heck, are Paula, Jeffrey, Matthew or Mary always there when you could use their help? We love the smaller galleries, for this and so many other reasons.

Johnson_Christopher_Creamed.jpg
Christopher Lowry Johnson Creamed 2006 oil on canvas 30″ x 38″

More images can be found on the artist’s own site, although he grants that “the elusive ‘platform’ . . . continues to escape accurate documentation”.

new cold wars

Ostend_rampart_defense.jpg
defense, like charity, used to begin at home

We might have enjoyed a golden age, but instead we have been condemned by small, stupid, and evil minds to bear the burden of a new, unspecific [hot and] cold war all over the world.
When the soviet regimes collapsed, as this excellent Craig S. Smith report in today’s NYTimes sadly reminds us, we fumbled an extraordinary opportunity of a kind and on a scale never before offered to a civilization.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall, as Soviet troops withdrew from Eastern Europe and America began to talk about closing bases in Germany, Europe looked as if it might become the big, peaceful, postmodern federation that European Union architects had long dreamed of: a humanist club where conflicts at home and abroad would be resolved by talking everything to death instead of killing.
Then the Balkans blew up and the United States military stepped in to stop a war that Europe seemed incapable of facing. That frustrated Russia, which supported Serbia in the war, but Russia could not offer much help because it was still impotent and staggering from the collapse of its Soviet empire.
Now Russia is rich with oil and gas and its military spending is soaring.

I have to add that the U.S. missed the even larger possibility fifteen years ago of helping all the people of the Russian federation to become full partners in that “humanist club” and to share in the security, prosperity and culture of a flourishing and vibrant civilization. It could have created a system which would offer to the greater world community a selfless beneficence and opportunities for indigenous development on a scale unimagined and certainly unprecedented. The most enlightened expectation and happiest consequence would have been seeing the character of the dominant culture itself peacefully re-shaped by the rich diversity of the peoples of a thriving globe.
Instead, we got George H. W. Bush, William Jefferson Clinton and George W. Bush. We also got the incompetence and malignancy of Russian leadership, too many small-minded men and women in all European governments, some incredibly inept, even vile, leaders in Eastern and Southeastern Europe, and powerless or indifferent populations almost everywhere. But it was up to America to lose the game.
And we did it big.
So far we’ve avoided nuclear annihilation, but we got a rogue Russia and a rogue U.S., a fake “war on terror”, a religious war, a new economic imperialism battling its opponents all over the world, a renewed arms race and a “missile shield” (along with their truly prohibitive costs which empty every nation’s social treasury), a cultural war, and finally, and almost certainly most fatally for us all, the predicted death of the planet itself, all remedies neglected or spurned because of the distractions of our other fratricidal frailties.
The Times article is ostensively about a specific U.S. program, but the first paragraphs tell us as much about what I’ve called “small, stupid, and evil minds” as it does about this administration’s European “missile defense shield” program.

Much of Europe is arguing over a Washington proposal to plant in Poland fewer than a dozen antimissile missiles that might not work, to guard against an Iranian threat that may not exist.
The main party in Poland’s governing coalition is inclined to accept the deal, and the country’s president, Lech Kaczynski, known in Europe for his fierce conservatism and nationalist talk, has been invited to the White House in July to talk things over with President Bush.
The Czech Republic’s fragile government coalition, meanwhile, has agreed to negotiate placement of high-powered American tracking radar on its soil despite widespread local opposition. The radar, now in the Marshall Islands, would help guide the antimissile missiles from Poland to hit and destroy their fast-moving targets in outer space.
The European missile shield would be part of an integrated system that is already taking shape in California and Alaska, where the United States expects to deploy 30 long-range interceptors to guard against missile attack by the end of 2008.
Washington says the Eastern European system could act in time to protect most of Europe and all of the United States and even much of Russia from a nuclear attack by Iran, that is, if Iran ever developed or obtained nuclear weapons and rockets with a range long enough to reach those targets, as well as a desire to fire them. They don’t have those armaments now, but they might by 2015, the Bush administration says.

But the entire system is in fact a big, very costly joke.

The 10 interceptor missiles that Washington is proposing to put in Poland could hardly stop Russia’s hundreds of intercontinental ballistic missiles in the event of all-out war.
The American antimissile missiles will be placed too close to Russia to be of use against ICBMs fired from anywhere west of the Ural Mountains. If they work, though, the antimissile missiles in Alaska and California could stop a Russian ICBM fired in America’s direction from east of the Urals. The fact is that in tests the antimissile missiles don’t work much of the time, and when they do it is under controlled circumstances that are far from typical in an actual attack.

Is insanity or calculation? For over six years, on almost everything they’ve done, the Bushies have absolutely confounded my ability to decide.

[image of detail from early 17th-century Flemish map of Ostend defense ramparts from search.com]