
(too much free speech)
An AP story in Newsday reports that Reverend Billy was arrested Friday night while loudly reciting the First Amendment to police.
Could anything make it more clear what’s going on in this city? It’s time for all New Yorkers to form a larger critical mass of resistance to this dangerous lunacy before we’ve lost our liberties for ever.
Gothamist tells us that a press release the blog received after the arrest of a man whose day job consists largely of exhorting people to abandon the products of large corporations and mass media, observes that “while the NYPD surrounded and intimidated last night’s Critical Mass cyclists, a line of several hundred shoppers formed just across the street to purchase the new iPhone, blocking pedestrian traffic and forcing people to walk in the street.” Whoa! This is all way, way beyond irony.
Go here, to Matt Semel’s annotated flickr set of images, for a good-humored, inside look at Friday night’s bike ride and the police tension which preceded it.
[image by Konstantin Sergeyev from revbilly.com]
Category: NYC
Chris Quinn asks our civil rights to “take one for the team”
in this case an objective clearly worth a monstrous sacrifice
Was the sacrifice of our right to assemble and speak just a matter of “taking one for the team“? And if it was, what will there be left to win if the team makes the finals?
I sent an email out to a few friends last night after picking up a copy of this week’s Gay City News. I had hoped to find an article on Chris Quinn which might explain to her larger core community why I and so many others are upset with her these days.
There was an article, but I left wondering how anyone not familiar with the subject of her collaboration and authorization of what is euphemistically referred to as the Police “Parade Rules” might be able to figure what the fuss is about.
I wrote, in part:
We can see that our most prominent community newspaper isn’t really interested in the interests of its community, but rather, in its designated hero’s ability [in the words of one person quoted in the article] “to take a stand on issues she believes in that aren’t always popular among different constituent groups”, or, to excerpt another quote from a member of the community used in the article, “any elected official’s need to balance the concerns of many groups”.
I received an interesting reply from Andy Podell, one of my addressees, and he agreed to be quoted. It’s the best explanation I’ve come across for what looks like a totally baffling decision from a former community street acitivist, but although I don’t consider myself politically naive its implications disturb me:
One of the unspoken rules in American politics is that politicians who come from minority communities must show the big boys that they can be tough on their own constituency. Chuck Schumer and George Bush are not required to slap the community around that elected them to show that they’re impartial. But Hilary Clinton and Christine Quinn are required to reassure those in power that they no longer represent their voting base. The battle for representative democracy is over before it begins.
So, does this suggest we’re better off not supporting minority politicians? I’m throwing this out mostly as a provocation; I’m depressed, but maybe not yet that depressed.
[image from perfectduluthday]
police to regulate when we can use cameras in NYC

just another day on the street
Last time it was the MTA, and now the Mayor of New York City wants to keep us from taking its picture.
The Transit Authority eventually gave up on its proposed photography ban, but now the same kind of primitive fears and territorial claims have spawned another threat. The gothamist has the story:
The Mayor’s Office of Theater, Film, and Broadcasting, which coordinates film and television production and issues permits around the five boroughs, is considering rules that could potentially severely restrict the ability of even amateur photographers and filmmakers to operate in New York City. The NY Times reports that the city’s tentative rules include requiring any group of two or more people who want to use a camera in a single public location for more than a half hour to get a city permit and $1 million in liability insurance. The regulation would also apply to any group of five or more people who would be using a tripod for more than ten minutes, including the time to set up the tripod.
And are we going to learn next month that if two or more people want to leave a building at the same time (including their own homes) they’ll have to get a police permit? And don’t forget your papers. The city’s government and police are totally out of control!
This is New York CIty, damn it, not Moscow or Beijing!
My shock at this latest assault on urban spontaneity, creativity, the simple rights of assembly and expression, and of course what our leader has called “the internets” doesn’t mean I’ve forgotten that for years the police have already been stopping people all over the City, even individual amateur photographers, for using their cameras. The officers ask questions, sometimes telling them they weren’t allowed to shoot pictures in public places, and then asking for their identification and making them wait while their information and the detainment is recorded on the officer’s day record. I’m sure this will continue to go on regardless of whether the proposed new police authority is effected (as usual, without hearings or a City Council vote).
I hope I’m not the only private citizen in New York who is also thinking of the impact the rule would have on our ability to document police abuses themselves, but I’m sure since taxpayers have been shelling out a fortune in awards to those falsely-arrested, injured or killed by an unrestrained constabulary, both the Mayor’s office and One Police Plaza understand the proposal’s ramifications perfectly.
These proposed new police rules follow another civil liberties abomination, one recently initiated by the NYPD itself, with the collaboration and actual authorization of former Leftist-activist Council Speaker Chistine Quinn.
Neither notions about swift vehicle traffic flow nor the mantra of “9/11” should be allowed to transcend our proper concern with strengthening an increasingly-precarious civilization.
Many of us thought our system of law enforcement was already arbitrary, but apparently we ain’t seen nothing yet. Be very careful the next time you question an officer of the law; he made it.
[image by Mason Resnick via adorama]
Shepard Fairey takes on U.S. rotten moral currency in print

I had almost forgotten that I had this image. It’s been on my computer for a week. Once you get past its nightmare-come-alive reference, I think this Shepard Fairey* piece is very beautiful, not least for the color and quality of the faux-dollar bill printing. And then there’s also the ambiance of its immediate surroundings on this Lower East Side wall – and the late afternoon sun.
*
if I’m wrong about the attribution, somebody let me know
RHA and Queer Justice League march for assembly rights

We were colorful, loud, beautiful and cute, joyful and fierce, and we never really stopped moving, even when the march did. One of the group described himself today, after eleven hours of sleep, as a survivor of “the anarcho-queer olympics that was our participation in the parade.
The crowd was crazy about this “unpermitted” band of RHA and Queer Justice League activists, even if the serious message of their visuals and their chants might initially have escaped some of the people shrieking with glee behind the barriers on each side of the street. I walked down Fifth Avenue from somewhere in the 50’s and all the way to the river, and I never heard a single discouraging word.
In any event, on Sunday thousands of people saw the pink and white flyers we handed out and should be able to understand today that this group and its reason for being there on the streets related more closely to the original Stonewall than anything else in this 38th anniversary march.
I’ve uploaded some additional (thumbnail) images of these animated street lobbyists below [click to enlarge]:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NYPD rough up, arrest civil rights lawyer and wife

Geeeesh. Lawyering while black. Well, maybe that’s a bit harsh, since there’s no way to demonstrate that the New York police officers who beat a civil rights attorney and his wife yesterday would have behaved any differently had the citizens not been black and had they known one was an attorney. More likely it was just business as usual for a force which too often seems to be out of control.
And Speaker Quinn tells us we should trust these guys to decide who can be on the streets?
From Newsday:
City and state officials are denouncing the arrests of a civil rights attorney and his wife after the couple intervened when, they said, police beat a handcuffed teen in central Brooklyn. Protesters returned to a police station yesterday to rally against the arrests and alleged brutality.
Michael Warren, who once represented Tupac Shakur and the teens charged in the Central Park jogger case, and his wife, Evelyn, said a police supervisor also beat them Thursday after kicking the subdued teen during his arrest on suspicion of car theft.
“They tackled him to the ground,” Warren told reporters yesterday at a news conference outside City Hall. “They handcuffed him right away. He was not a threat.”
The couple said that six officers beat the teen “like a rag doll.” A sergeant turned on the couple when they stopped their car to ask police what they were doing, Warren said. He then arrested the couple.
This story was not in our edition of the NYTimes this morning, but here’s the link to the report in Newsday.
[image from dennisflood]
NYPD secretly granted permits to Dyke Marches for years

Friday night’s NYC Dyke March
In the middle of everything else he was balancing this weekend Tim Doody of The Radical Homosexual Agenda [RHA] forwarded this I-Witness Video item to me on on Saturday, when I only read it very quickly. It seemed so fantastical that I wanted to check out the story before I repeated it, but no one I talked to outside of the RHA this weekend seemed to have heard anything about it. Actually of course, I should never have had any doubts about it since the byline is that of Eileen Clancy, the video activist who was instrumental, along with many others, in exposing the lies and political arbitrariness of the NYPD arrest sweeps and citizen lockdowns during the RNC.
This is only an excerpt, from a story which only gets more interesting in a public transcript included in the remainder of the full text:
Saturday, 23 Jun 2007
by Eileen Clancy
Through the spring and summer months, the New York City Police Department has continued its campaign to shut down, suppress and contain political demonstrations, often in a completely unreasonable, ill-informed and even insulting manner. Recently, the Police Department has outright refused or stalled permits for events organized by the African Diaspora Education Society, Gays and Lesbians of Bushwick Empowered, the PrideFest and the Audre Lorde Project’s Trans Day of Action.
Yet, even as many groups scramble to assemble pro-bono teams of attorneys to fight for permission to hold events, the NYPD has secretly issued a parade permit to the largest annual unauthorized political gathering on a Manhattan street, the 15th annual New York City Dyke March. Later today, tens of thousands of lesbians and their supporters will sally forth onto Fifth Avenue in a parade of lesbian visibility without knowing that their display has received the seal of government approval.
That’s right, unrequested by and unbeknownst to the organizers, the NYPD has granted legally permitted status to the Dyke March and has done so for years.
How do we know this? Because Assistant Chief Thomas Graham, the commander of the Disorder Control Unit and the NYPD’s expert on managing political demonstrations, says so in sworn testimony.
When I first read this story I felt like I was having a through-the-looking-glass moment. Then I got really mad. For years an alert and dedicated citizenry has been working very hard, putting their energy, time, jobs and money on the line, to exercise Constitutional rights which the police and their political allies refuse to recognize, but all along the constabulary has been justifying their occasional and apparently random passivity internally, and protecting their own rights and freedom of movement, by officially granting permits not requested.
It’s incredibly patronizing, of course, but much more is going on here. Nothing may better illustrate the arbitrariness of police power in New York City, where not only does the NYPD make law on its own, but it can [appear to] violate those laws whenever it so chooses.
[image from Nicole Marti‘s Flckr page]
Queers slam Quinn during Stonewall anniversary march

scene early today at the support truck bike for an “unpermitted” march RHA/Queer Justice League contingent
[more tomorrow]
NYC: yes to “street fairs”, no to homo festival

the view from the parlor today
It’s not the pedestrian street we had in mind.
We awakened this morning to the sweet refrain of amplified hawkers of corporately-manufactured goods, and the stench of greasy food. Yes it’s another so-called “neighborhood street fair” in Chelsea. We get at least half a dozen each year below our windows and on the blocks radiating from the intersection one hundred feet to the west.
The city authorities seem to love these things; the neighborhoods don’t. These regular floods of open stalls have absolutely nothing to do with the people or small businesses whose apartments and storefronts they engulf: New Yorkers really don’t knit tubesocks in home workshops and we don’t shuck corn on our fire escapes.
My real point in writing this is to point out the hypocrisy of a multi-ethnic City like this one continuing to permit these abominations, which corrupt the concept of a genuine neighborhood fair, while at the same time refusing to permit the queer community to hold their Pride Festival tomorrow, which happens only once a year, in the very queer (okay, mostly only “gay”) community of Chelsea.
The content of that last paragraph comes from Barry, who made the deliciously-derisive juxtaposition immediately after I told him what I had seen outside our front windows.
trans march led by police wagon, loads of handcuffs ready
One of our sources tell us that tonight’s Trans March was phenomenal!
Donald Grove commented on Bloggy’s post about the Audre Lord Project‘s experience trying to secure a permit for a transgender march tonight. This is the text of this queer supporter’s brief report:
I just finished the Trans March, and I am a bit too footsore to do the Drag
March. But I am thrilled to say that the Trans March was very VERY big. I
would guess around 500 people. Lots of trans folks with a strong mix of
gender non-conforming and queer support. It was excellent!
We got to march in the street most of the way, which was smart, because the
march was so big. But we were preceded almost the entire way by a paddy
wagon, with smiling cops holding their bundles of plastic handcuffs. I
suppose they could make some screwy stupid statement about protecting the
march from bashers, but who would buy that? They were their with the paddy
wagon first because they wanted to send a message to that uppity Audre
Lorde Project for taking them to court.
Well screw the cops! The march was huge, and all the police accomplished
was to look puffy, pasty and pointless in the company of so many awesome,
sexy, spirited gender-self-defining folks, both young and old, of many
colors!!!
I wasn’t there, but I have to add my own wee commnent:
This has got to stop! A happy group of peaceful marchers who have been brutalized by the police for millenia were forced to accept the deliberately-confrontational imposition of an NYPD police wagon, together with its armed and restraint-laden crew, as their very visible “grand marshal” when they chose to parade through their own neighborhoods.
Were there police snipers on the roof, like during the Puerto Rico Day Parade? I’m also surprised that our guardians of public order don’t seem to have swept up spectators who were wearing their pink or lavender gang colors.

While we’re on the subject of marches and marshals, does anyone else find it problematic, if no longer surprising, that both of the grand marshals in the really big queer march on Sunday, Sharon Kleinbaum and Troy Perry, are members of the clergy?
[image of NYC police at the 2004 RNC from Theoria via Daily Kos]