a “7th haven” on international Park(ing) Day

Times_Up_7th_Haven.jpg
hanging out in a park and free bike repair station on 7th Avenue at Charles yesterday

7th_Haven_sign.jpg
Park(ing) Day, it’s about serious greenstreets

See Jim Dwyer’s column for a word picture of the larger footprint of New York’s part in the event, organized by the Trust for Public Land.
Another piece in the NYTimes reported:

The city’s Transportation Department does not know the total number of parking spaces in the city, but according to Transportation Alternatives, an advocacy group, 45 percent of public land in Manhattan is dedicated to moving and storing cars.

That’s a pretty impressive figure, especially since the total area of “public land” would include Central Park and every other square foot of park and sidewalk.

NOTES: I found the wonderful Barbara Ross photograph [earlier credited on the flickr site to Mike Pidell, who is actually in the photo instead] at the top of this entry while looking for pictures of yesterday’s events. The unremarkable image of the sign is mine. Finally, before I was told that the photo had mistakenly been credited to Pidell, while I was searching for a way I could link to him I located this delightful five-minute bike clown video from last year, “Bike Lane Liberation“.

[with thanks to Tim Doody, image by Barbara Ross from flickr]

Kissinger to be Grand Marshall of Steuben Day Parade

Kissinger_David_Levine.jpg
the Realpolitiker‘s very favorite Tracht

UPDATE: For concerned citizens of the world who might find the information useful, I’ve learned that Kissinger is expected to speak at the Parade Gala Benefit Banquet scheduled for 7 o’clock tonight, Friday, at the New York Hilton & Towers, 1335 Sixth Avenue, between 53rd and 54th Streets.

Would somebody please tell the folks behind New York’s German American Steuben Parade that having Henry Kissinger as a grand marshal is not cool at all. The kind of war crimes for which this man is wanted by governments in a number countries all over the world may be very American these days, but that doesn’t mean any ethnic group should be proud to be associated with their author, even if it has a tenuous relationship with the land of his birth.
I’m an American of unmixed German ancestry going back generations, I’ve studied U.S. and German history, and I’ve studied and lived here and in Deutschland, so I might be given some leave to say that I suspect the folks living in what the chairman of Saturday’s event calls the “alte Heimat” would not be so thick as some of their cousins over here seem to be. German Germans also generally know their history pretty well – for significant historical and moral reasons.
The big event is scheduled for this Saturday. I have to be in Greenpoint that afternoon, or I’d be there physically to remind him that not all of us have forgotten what he’s done. The parade starts at noon, and runs uptown on Fifth Avenue, starting at 63 Street and ending at 86 Street. I’m not sure how these thing work, that is, I don’t know where a so-called Grand Marshal might best be spotted, but there is a reviewing stand somewhere along the route of the march.
Tchuss!

[David Levine image from The Corsair]

NYTimes still mixing “editorial” with the news

yellow_journalism.jpg

I’m going to end up skimming the features and skipping the “news” pages altogether. Is anybody else noticing this stuff?
It’s looking like the NYTimes is out of control. This is the way one of the paper’s teasers read on today’s print front page:

In Iraq, the report from General Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker to Congress was viewed favorably because it portrayed the situation accurately [my italics]. While many said they preferred a quick withdrawal of troops, several seemed to accept that sectarian violence would keep American forces in Iraq for some time to come.

Inside the paper, on page A10, the article itself made it clear that the glowing opinion of the account given by the pair Maureen Dowd calls the “Surge Twins” was actually one held by the very few Iraqis the reporter either bothered to or was able to ask (perhaps in telephone interviews):

More than 20 Iraqis of different sects and ethnicities said in interviews across the country that they viewed the report favorably because it — or, at least the parts shown on television in Iraq — portrayed the situation accurately.

Does this sound like objective reporting? Most readers probably never made it to the tenth page, and so were left [deliberately?] with an impression of this historical encounter that had been created by a totally misleading marketing blurb/preview.

[image of 1888 Puck cartoon from answers.com]

no roll call for our own victims, on 9/11 or any other day

Guantanamo_saffron.jpg
GUANTANAMO DELENDA EST!

It’s the eleventh of September again. Yes, it happens once a year. But I’m not interested in adding to the revanchisme stoked by every mention of the terrible events which occurred in my city six years ago. I am interested in the fact that even if we wanted to we would be unable to read a list of the names of the hundreds of thousands of people we have killed in the name of our own dead (many of whom were from countries other than the U.S.).
Moreover, the continuing shame of our concentration camps at Guantanamo and elsewhere in the world doesn’t seem to be worthy of the attention of many who actually do oppose the war in Iraq.
We are letting ourselves be ridden by fools, fanatics, politicians and arms suppliers – and those who profit from the evil mischief done in our name. The killing could stop, the camps could be closed and the terror could be defused, but not if we refuse to look at the world outside – and continue to let others exploit us.

[fabric color swatch, otherwise unrelated to Guantanamo, from froggtoggs]

fuck Mother Teresa!

Mother_Teresa_Keating.gif
a very rewarding friendship (Blessed Teresa greeting friend Charles Keating)

On this tenth anniversary of the demise of Mother Teresa, the acclaimed world-champion of suffering and death [whose lifer inmates were refused even aspirin, but who died only after availing herself of the very finest and most expensive medical treatment available in the West], I can no longer stay silent.
I’ve written at some length about the mutha before, and I was going to ignore the outrageous outpouring of memorials which have attended this happy date until just now, when I came upon an editorial in today’s NYTimes with the oddly-equivocal headline, “A Saint of Darkness”. This is ostensibly a secular journal, but it’s a sappy paean and it ends with an extraordinary reference to the grotesque Catholic cult figure’s supposed struggles against religious disbelief. These gilded lines would almost certainly embarrass even the National Catholic Reporter:

Mother Teresa, sick with longing for a sense of the divine, kept faith with the sick of Calcutta. And now, dead for 10 years, she is poised to reach those who can at last recognize, in her, something of their own doubting, conflicted selves.

And now, as we’re told by the Church, her agent, she herself belongs to the gods.
But not so fast. There is another, less fictive take on this wretched creature than that so successfully hyped around the Western world. The Times editorial board itself may be of more than one mind on the subject of the “just-say-no-to-drugs-and-yes-to-Jesus nunnery fund-raiser and baptism zealot. On this same holy day, on the opposite page from the editorial they also publish an OP-ED piece by Chitrita Banerji, “Poor Calcutta”, which delivers a very different slant on the story of the woman with the current Vatican title, “Blessed Teresa of Calcutta”. Banerji is speaking first for the dignity of her hometown Calcutta [I share her love for that magnificent city], which she argues the scary nun and her fanatical acolytes have savaged in the public mind, but her defense requires some bluntness about the fundamental error of the campaign. Here are two excerpts:

[The worldwide condemnation of Calcutta over other cities] was an instance of spin in which the news media colluded — voluntarily or not — with a religious figure who was as shrewd as any fund-raising politician, as is evident from the global expansion of her organization. For Calcutta natives like me, however, Mother Teresa’s charity also evoked the colonial past — she felt she knew what was best for the third world masses, whether it was condemning abortion or offering to convert those who were on the verge of death.
. . . .
[Banerji writes that she had hoped that after the nun’s death the balance of perception might be restored to her beloved city] Ten years and one beatification later, however, the relentless hagiography of the Catholic Church and the peculiar tunnel vision of the news media continue to equate Calcutta with the twinned entities of destitution and succor publicized by Mother Teresa. With cultish fervor, her organization, the Missionaries of Charity, promotes her as an icon of mercy. Meanwhile, countless unheralded local organizations work for the needy without the glamour of a Nobel Prize or of impending sainthood.

Once again, on the true nature of Mother Superior Teresa and her Missionaries of Charity: No medical care was given to any of the people to whom members of her oder “ministered”; the Mother had a creepy lust for suffering; even by its founder’s own admission she was only interested in racking up the maximum numbers of “souls” for the next life; to that end any friendship, any kind of transaction was appropriate; and finally, the earthly Church she represented was not the compassionate institution imagined by many of her patrons, but rather one whose elements would be unrecognizable to even the most conservative of Catholics.
This sounds like they would want to create hell everywhere on earth; it would hardly seem to be a good advertisement for their regime in heaven, but what do I know about the attraction of marketing, fads, bandwagons or cults?

[image from zatma.org]

why was Craig taken down and Vitter not?

Toles_Marriage.gif
(but right, even laudable, if I paid women for quickies)

The Republicans have trashed and now unceremoniously sacked one of their very own worthy gentlemen for soliciting consensual, uncompensated sex with another person. Senator Craig was forced to resign only days after his sensational misstep (with another man) was reported in the media.
A year ago another model Republican, Representative Mark Foley, was hounded out of office for a peccadillo even less “awful” than that committed by the married-with-three-children Senator from Idaho. Foley, an unmarried man, sent suggestive emails and sexually explicit instant messages to young adult men who had formerly served or were at the time serving as Congressional pages.
A third Republican luminary, Senator David Vitter, admitted early in July to regularly soliciting the services of a female prostitute. There has been no investigation and no movement to oust Vitter from his elected position or party responsibilities, and in fact on his return to the senate floor later in the month Vitter was greeted with a standing ovation by his Republican peers.
Why is there such a difference in the way their colleagues treated these three members of Congress? Craig and Foley happened to be of what their former friends would call the homosexual “persuasion” but Vitter seems to be fixated on the role of lusty heterosexual.
Oh, there is the thing about the toilet venue of Craig’s ruinous flirtation (Americans are obsessed with potties – all potties) and also the extraordinarily-significant fact that should Vitter resign his seat it would be filled by a Democrat named by the Democratic governor of Louisiana. Unfortunately for Craig the Governor of Idaho is a Republican. Foley’s was an interesting case: It suggests that here the Republicans’ sincere bigotry might have gotten the better of them since their hand-picked candidate to replace the homo failed to make it in the election which followed his resignation. Of course it could also have been the product of an excessive self-confidence, one which wouldn’t have survived the last year of spiraling Republican disasters.
Of course I’m not going to contrast any of this with the Democrat’s treatment of Jerry Studds and Barney Frank [neither lost his job], the Republican attitude toward Presidential sex, or toward Congressional corruption involving real crimes with real victims. And while I’m not speaking of real victims, I’m not going to speak about the real, countless, world-wide victims of the first eight and one half years of this Republican administration.
“Hypocrisy” is far too mild a word for this stuff.

[image by Tom Toles via Washington Post]

the real meaning of Labor Day [redux]

Pullman_strike_guard_harpers.jpg
National Guardsmen firing into demonstrators during the 1894 Chicago Pullman strike* [contemporary Harpers Weekly drawing]

[Exactly five years ago today (I see now that it was almost to the minute) I did a post, “the real meaning of Labor Day“. I think it’s time to do it again. My own brief text was augmented with quotes from the site of Jim Lehrer’s PBS show, NewsHour, a page which had appeared the year before. This year I’ve added an image.]
It’s not the barbeque, and it’s certainly not the traffic. It was born as an attempt to appease the working people of America. [Remember the Pullman strike in history class?] Unfortunately it seems to have worked too well.

The observance of Labor Day began over 100 years ago. Conceived by America’s labor unions as a testament to their cause, the legislation sanctioning the holiday was shepherded through Congress amid labor unrest and signed by President Grover Cleveland as a reluctant election-year compromise.

Soon after, when the entire nation became thoroughly frightened by the bugbear of socialism and communism, the movement was de-radicalized. The real Left was gradually marginalized and almost totally eliminated from American culture and society. The workers’ movement itself became middle class, before it acquired the material benefits and political power which that adjustment should have delivered. And there it languishes.

In 1898, Samuel Gompers, head of the American Federation of Labor, called it “the day for which the toilers in past centuries looked forward, when their rights and their wrongs would be discussed…that the workers of our day may not only lay down their tools of labor for a holiday, but upon which they may touch shoulders in marching phalanx and feel the stronger for it.”
Almost a century since Gompers spoke those words, though, Labor Day is seen as the last long weekend of summer rather than a day for political organizing. In 1995, less than 15 percent of American workers belonged to unions, down from a high in the 1950’s of nearly 50 percent, though nearly all have benefited from the victories of the Labor movement.

Happy Labor Day, but don’t forget.

*
I haven’t been able to find a really good compact summary of the strike anywhere on line, although there is this setting of the broader context in a discussion from Howard Zinn. I would definitely welcome any other suggestions. I can however offer information on some of the numbers involved in the physical conflict itself, quoted here from the Kansas Heritage Group:

The total forces of the strikebreakers both government and private were [against 100,000 strikers]: 1,936 federal troops, 4,000 national guardsmen, about 5,000 extra deputy marshals, 250 extra deputy sheriffs, and the 3,000 policemen in Chicago for a total of 14,186 strikebreakers. In addition to these figures there were also twelve people shot and killed, and 71 people who were arrested and sentenced on the federal indictment.

No picnic.

[image from Wikimedia Commons}

“surge working” – surprise!

Gros_Antoine-Jean_Abukir.jpg
Antoine-Jean Gros “Battle of Abukir” 1806
but it never, ever looks like this

“Petraeus says Iraq ‘surge’ working” (headline of lead Reuters story on Yahoo!)
Do they think we have a hundred years to work on it? Do they think we’re actually going to be able to stay? Do they actually expect we can establish any order whatsoever? Is our order their order? Under what mandate are we going to continue to occupy and terrorize another people? Have they any idea how these things always turn out? Do they know this is a grotesque imperialism, regardless of what they choose to call it this time around? Can we, and can the rest of the world, afford the luxury of our deceit, our mistakes, our illusions?
Don’t they realize we know their speeches by heart?

Leopold’s Congo (1885-1908)
French Indo-China (1887-1954)
Portuguese Angola (1486-1975)
Italian East Africa (1936-1942)
British South Africa (1795-1961)
American Phillipines (1899-1946)
Soviet Afghanistan (1979-1988)
Chinese Tibet (1950-?)
Japanese Nanjing (1937-1945)
Japanese Manchukuo (1932–1945)
German eastern Reich (1938-1945)
French North Africa (1830-1962)
Ottoman southeastern Europe (1453-1919)
British Ireland (1171-1921-?)
Spanish Netherlands (1579-1713)
Russian empire (1654-1991-?)
United States empire (?-1898-?)

[image from allthingsbeautiful]

“war on terrorism” is new McCarthyism: Gibran victim

Red_scare_1917.jpg
we have a history

Except to most of the poor citizen infantry of every description and every station which it has been enlisting for six years, the so-called “war on terror” has always been fundamentally about controlling the powerless – and sustaining the power of the powerful.
By 2001, after almost a century of the political and social distortions and perversions committed in the name of fighting what ordinary folk were told was their enemy both outside the country and in their midst, the dreaded “Red Terror” had melted away. The lies which had succeeded in destroying the American Left had to be remodeled. A new devil had to be invented. And surprise! The Arab/Muslim world, the new monolithic (conceptualized) enemy, showed up on our doorsteps just in time.
Fifty years ago Senator Joseph McCarthy had shown us exactly how to go about fighting our imaginary devils. Some New Yorkers seem to have taken their cues directly from the American witchhunt which managed to silence or send into exile, among so many others, Charlie Chaplin, W.E.B. DuBois, Clifford Odets, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Paul Robeson, Bertholt Brecht, Hans Eisler and Pete Seeger.
You’d think that after 230 years what is now the strongest and richest nation in the world might finally be able to stand up for its professed principles and stop crippling itself in regular paroxysms of fear about real or imagined enemies allegedly capable of undoing us all.
I’ve wanted to write something on this story since it first broke, but what I knew about its complexity discouraged me from trying to do so in any compact form. Maybe the controversy about a school’s conception and the form it was to assume had to be separated from what happened afterward.
Today the NYTimes carries a column on the Education page by Samuel C. Freedman, Columbia professor of journalism, which manages to assemble the basic facts and calmly describe the enormously-important issues involved. It’s an appalling story of a distinguished teacher and social activist being defamed and peremptorily removed from a public post because of a racist, cultist and nativist stupidity and hysteria driven by media and political operatives and bosses representing the most shameful political opportunism, or deliberate calculation.
And remember this is in the multicultural, polyglot, ethnic cornucopia of New York City. From Freedman’s piece in the Times:

�I hope it burns to the ground just like the towers did with all the students inside including school officials as well,� wrote an unidentified blogger on the Web site Modern Tribalist, a hub of anti-immigrant sentiment. A contributor identified as Dave responded, �Now Muslims will be able to learn how to become terrorists without leaving New York City.�
Not to be outdone, the conservative Web site Political Dishonesty carried this commentary on Feb. 14:
�Just think, instead of jocks, cheerleaders and nerds, there�s going to be the Taliban hanging out on the history hall, Al Qaeda hanging out by the gym, and Palestinians hanging out in the science labs. Hamas and Hezbollah studies will be the prerequisite classes for an Iranian physics. Maybe in gym they�ll learn how to wire their bomb vests and they�ll convert the football field to a terrorist training camp.�
Thus commenced the smear campaign against the Khalil Gibran International Academy and, specifically, Debbie Almontaser. For the next six months, from blogs to talk shows to cable networks to the right-wing press, the hysteria and hatred never ceased. Regrettably, it worked.
Ms. Almontaser resigned as principal earlier this month.

The school is designed to be entirely secular. It is named for a Lebanese-born Christian poet and visual artist who lived in New York. Eventually it is to include the sixth through twelfth grades, offering classes such as math and science in both Arabic and English. The academy will be one of more than 60 existing dual-language city schools teaching in languages such as Russian, Spanish and Chinese. The new principal unfortunately does not speak Arabic, but the fact that she is a Jew rather than an Arab might not have been a problem for the school’s cosmopolitan namesake.

For a richer perspective read this excellent narrative from Steve Quester, a New York educator, activist and friend of mine, who is familiar with Almontaser’s work.
There’s also an excellent piece, “Jewish Shootout Over Arab School“, in The Jewish Week, from which I have excerpted a section describing Almontaser’s place in the larger community and the dismay of one wise and compassionate Jew concerned about what the incident will mean to his own community as well as that of New York City and even the nation as a whole:

Almontaser, a public school teacher and administrator, was born in Yemen but immigrated here when she was three. Since 9/11, the slight woman in a hijab had emerged as a prominent advocate in the Muslim community for reaching out and working with other faiths. After the attacks her son, an Army Reserve officer, served as a rescue worker at Ground Zero.
Among other things, Almontaser had invited hundreds of Jews and Christians to her own home in the wake of the terrorist attack to help defang fear and anger towards Muslims. She had joined social action groups, such as We Are All Brooklyn, an inter-ethnic initiative supported by JCRC [the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater New York], to combat hate crimes in the dense, mixed neighborhoods of that borough. She had trained with ADL�s anti-bias program, A World of Difference, to become a better facilitator for diversity training and inter-group dynamics in the public schools.
Rabbi [Michael] Paley, a scholar-in-residence with UJA-Federation, warned that the prominent role played by a faction within the Jewish community in the attack on her would �come back and bite us. This begins to destroy the America that’s been so good to us.� Rabbi Paley, who has met Almontaser during interfaith activities, emphasized that in his remarks on this issue he was speaking only for himself and not his organization.
�The most important thing to know about the Muslim community here is that it replicates the Jewish community from many years ago,� he said. �These are people trying to become Americans as hard as they can, and also trying hard not to lose their identity, just as groups before them did.
�The idea that unless they pass an acid test � that Muslims are terrorists until proven innocent � will mean that none will pass. We are ultimately blocking them from becoming American,� he warned. The result, he said, would be an Arab immigrant community more isolated and less assimilated, �like the Arabs in France.� [my italics]
The message to the Arab-American community as a result of this debacle was, �You�re a fool to think they�ll accept you,� he said.

[image of James Pinckney Alley from Assumption College]

cop sitting in toilet stall enticed Senator Craig for sex

Roman_Public_Toilets_Ostia.jpg
ruins of public toilet in ancient port of Ostia

Okay, even if no one has asked, does anyone want to know my take on the Senator Craig homosex arrest story? Well, it was actually my second thought, the less-than-honorable gentleman being a Republican, but it became paramount a few seconds after I began to read the arresting officer’s account of the incident in Roll Call, the capitol Hill newspaper.
I think it’s called “entrapment” when it happens to the people we think of as the good guys.
Isn’t anyone else out there concerned about the fact that police officers in Minneapolis are being paid to sit inside airport bathroom stalls to trap guys interested in getting off?

[image from darkcreek]