
the Realpolitiker‘s very favorite Tracht
UPDATE: For concerned citizens of the world who might find the information useful, I’ve learned that Kissinger is expected to speak at the Parade Gala Benefit Banquet scheduled for 7 o’clock tonight, Friday, at the New York Hilton & Towers, 1335 Sixth Avenue, between 53rd and 54th Streets.
Would somebody please tell the folks behind New York’s German American Steuben Parade that having Henry Kissinger as a grand marshal is not cool at all. The kind of war crimes for which this man is wanted by governments in a number countries all over the world may be very American these days, but that doesn’t mean any ethnic group should be proud to be associated with their author, even if it has a tenuous relationship with the land of his birth.
I’m an American of unmixed German ancestry going back generations, I’ve studied U.S. and German history, and I’ve studied and lived here and in Deutschland, so I might be given some leave to say that I suspect the folks living in what the chairman of Saturday’s event calls the “alte Heimat” would not be so thick as some of their cousins over here seem to be. German Germans also generally know their history pretty well – for significant historical and moral reasons.
The big event is scheduled for this Saturday. I have to be in Greenpoint that afternoon, or I’d be there physically to remind him that not all of us have forgotten what he’s done. The parade starts at noon, and runs uptown on Fifth Avenue, starting at 63 Street and ending at 86 Street. I’m not sure how these thing work, that is, I don’t know where a so-called Grand Marshal might best be spotted, but there is a reviewing stand somewhere along the route of the march.
Tchuss!
[David Levine image from The Corsair]
Category: War
NYTimes still mixing “editorial” with the news

I’m going to end up skimming the features and skipping the “news” pages altogether. Is anybody else noticing this stuff?
It’s looking like the NYTimes is out of control. This is the way one of the paper’s teasers read on today’s print front page:
In Iraq, the report from General Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker to Congress was viewed favorably because it portrayed the situation accurately [my italics]. While many said they preferred a quick withdrawal of troops, several seemed to accept that sectarian violence would keep American forces in Iraq for some time to come.
Inside the paper, on page A10, the article itself made it clear that the glowing opinion of the account given by the pair Maureen Dowd calls the “Surge Twins” was actually one held by the very few Iraqis the reporter either bothered to or was able to ask (perhaps in telephone interviews):
More than 20 Iraqis of different sects and ethnicities said in interviews across the country that they viewed the report favorably because it or, at least the parts shown on television in Iraq portrayed the situation accurately.
Does this sound like objective reporting? Most readers probably never made it to the tenth page, and so were left [deliberately?] with an impression of this historical encounter that had been created by a totally misleading marketing blurb/preview.
[image of 1888 Puck cartoon from answers.com]
no roll call for our own victims, on 9/11 or any other day

GUANTANAMO DELENDA EST!
It’s the eleventh of September again. Yes, it happens once a year. But I’m not interested in adding to the revanchisme stoked by every mention of the terrible events which occurred in my city six years ago. I am interested in the fact that even if we wanted to we would be unable to read a list of the names of the hundreds of thousands of people we have killed in the name of our own dead (many of whom were from countries other than the U.S.).
Moreover, the continuing shame of our concentration camps at Guantanamo and elsewhere in the world doesn’t seem to be worthy of the attention of many who actually do oppose the war in Iraq.
We are letting ourselves be ridden by fools, fanatics, politicians and arms suppliers – and those who profit from the evil mischief done in our name. The killing could stop, the camps could be closed and the terror could be defused, but not if we refuse to look at the world outside – and continue to let others exploit us.
[fabric color swatch, otherwise unrelated to Guantanamo, from froggtoggs]
well, not quite Einsatzgruppen, but kangaroo courts for sure

another site found to be invaluable as a ruin (the Reichstag burning, 1933)
“U.S. builds for future at Guantanamo“
GUANTANAMO BAY U.S. NAVAL BASE, Cuba (Reuters) – The U.S. military is building a mobile courtroom complex on an unused runway at the Guantanamo Bay naval base and plans to be ready by March to conduct as many as three terrorism trials at a time.
I saw this horrific headline and its story early yesterday and I’ll confess that my imagination immediately ran out of control. The first thing that came into my head was an association of these traveling units with the Nazi regime’s Einsatzgruppen (“task forces”), the official euphemism used for the mobile killing units which followed its armies as they advanced into Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union during World War II.
I immediately checked the historical facts however and I was reminded that the Wehrmacht‘s portable units did not even pretend to have a judicial element. Still, the idea of the heroic conquerors of Fascism and Communism creating mobile courtrooms to hand out extra-judicial judgments against a group of people whom we’ve been concentrating together for years in an inaccessible extra-territorial prison camp drives me absolutely crazy! Don’t these political villains and idiots have any sense of what this looks like? Or do they even care?
Of course to be fair to myself in my original call on this Reuters story, it’s not as if we haven’t been guilty of extra-judicial killing ourselves throughout the entire course of our war in Iraq, and much of it stinks of racism. I don’t even have to talk about the crimes committed by frightened young soldiers introduced into an alien land without appropriate numbers or equipment and without a proper mission.
Sometimes we actually boast about our official bloodletting. This is from a July 29, 2003 post on Jurist:
Last week the US military assassinated Uday and Qusai Hussein in a villa in Mosul, Iraq. Hundreds of troops armed with automatic weapons, rockets, rocket-propelled grenades, and tow missiles, and dozens of vehicles and aircraft, attacked four people armed with AK-47 automatic rifles. Mustapha, the 14-year old son of Qusai, was also killed in the operation, along with another individual who was apparently a bodyguard.
. . . .
The assassinations prompted chest-thumping and back-slapping all around. Even Senator Ted Kennedy joined British Prime Minister Tony Blair, The New York Times and the Washington Post, in congratulating Bush on the good news.
Except for the distinct difference between their initial senses of judicial urgency, a more appropriate reference for the quickie tribunals we are finally planning to set up in Guantanamo after all this time would be a court we ourselves destroyed sixty years ago: The Nazi Volksgerichtshof (“People’s Court”) was also set up outside the operations of any constitutional frame of law and the record of its hideous procedures illustrates some of the same perversions of justice. The excuse for the establishment of this Nazi political court was what the government insisted was the danger its sworn enemies posed to the health and security of the population. The Reichstag fire, the destruction of a very visible national symbol, was described as an act of terror, and its partisans were supposedly everywhere.
The “People’s Court” dispensed with ordinary juristic procedures and its indictments, its verdicts and its sentences were all determined by political dictate. Our own wheeled Cuban courtrooms will represent an ad hoc legal system that follows neither civilian nor military law, and it is outside the international laws of war established under any number of valid treaties, some in effect for well over a century. We know what it does follow, and that image should frighten us as much as it does its designated targets.
No, I’m not claiming that the contemporary U.S. is Nazi Germany, but at the current rate at which we are giving up our rights and our principles, I have to wonder what it is that we are we going to hold onto in order to be able to distinguish our system from the evil we once recognized in another?
[image from wikimedia]
“surge working” – surprise!

Antoine-Jean Gros “Battle of Abukir” 1806
but it never, ever looks like this
“Petraeus says Iraq ‘surge’ working” (headline of lead Reuters story on Yahoo!)
Do they think we have a hundred years to work on it? Do they think we’re actually going to be able to stay? Do they actually expect we can establish any order whatsoever? Is our order their order? Under what mandate are we going to continue to occupy and terrorize another people? Have they any idea how these things always turn out? Do they know this is a grotesque imperialism, regardless of what they choose to call it this time around? Can we, and can the rest of the world, afford the luxury of our deceit, our mistakes, our illusions?
Don’t they realize we know their speeches by heart?
Leopold’s Congo (1885-1908)
French Indo-China (1887-1954)
Portuguese Angola (1486-1975)
Italian East Africa (1936-1942)
British South Africa (1795-1961)
American Phillipines (1899-1946)
Soviet Afghanistan (1979-1988)
Chinese Tibet (1950-?)
Japanese Nanjing (1937-1945)
Japanese Manchukuo (19321945)
German eastern Reich (1938-1945)
French North Africa (1830-1962)
Ottoman southeastern Europe (1453-1919)
British Ireland (1171-1921-?)
Spanish Netherlands (1579-1713)
Russian empire (1654-1991-?)
United States empire (?-1898-?)
[image from allthingsbeautiful]
“war on terrorism” is new McCarthyism: Gibran victim

we have a history
Except to most of the poor citizen infantry of every description and every station which it has been enlisting for six years, the so-called “war on terror” has always been fundamentally about controlling the powerless – and sustaining the power of the powerful.
By 2001, after almost a century of the political and social distortions and perversions committed in the name of fighting what ordinary folk were told was their enemy both outside the country and in their midst, the dreaded “Red Terror” had melted away. The lies which had succeeded in destroying the American Left had to be remodeled. A new devil had to be invented. And surprise! The Arab/Muslim world, the new monolithic (conceptualized) enemy, showed up on our doorsteps just in time.
Fifty years ago Senator Joseph McCarthy had shown us exactly how to go about fighting our imaginary devils. Some New Yorkers seem to have taken their cues directly from the American witchhunt which managed to silence or send into exile, among so many others, Charlie Chaplin, W.E.B. DuBois, Clifford Odets, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Paul Robeson, Bertholt Brecht, Hans Eisler and Pete Seeger.
You’d think that after 230 years what is now the strongest and richest nation in the world might finally be able to stand up for its professed principles and stop crippling itself in regular paroxysms of fear about real or imagined enemies allegedly capable of undoing us all.
I’ve wanted to write something on this story since it first broke, but what I knew about its complexity discouraged me from trying to do so in any compact form. Maybe the controversy about a school’s conception and the form it was to assume had to be separated from what happened afterward.
Today the NYTimes carries a column on the Education page by Samuel C. Freedman, Columbia professor of journalism, which manages to assemble the basic facts and calmly describe the enormously-important issues involved. It’s an appalling story of a distinguished teacher and social activist being defamed and peremptorily removed from a public post because of a racist, cultist and nativist stupidity and hysteria driven by media and political operatives and bosses representing the most shameful political opportunism, or deliberate calculation.
And remember this is in the multicultural, polyglot, ethnic cornucopia of New York City. From Freedman’s piece in the Times:
�I hope it burns to the ground just like the towers did with all the students inside including school officials as well,� wrote an unidentified blogger on the Web site Modern Tribalist, a hub of anti-immigrant sentiment. A contributor identified as Dave responded, �Now Muslims will be able to learn how to become terrorists without leaving New York City.�
Not to be outdone, the conservative Web site Political Dishonesty carried this commentary on Feb. 14:
�Just think, instead of jocks, cheerleaders and nerds, there�s going to be the Taliban hanging out on the history hall, Al Qaeda hanging out by the gym, and Palestinians hanging out in the science labs. Hamas and Hezbollah studies will be the prerequisite classes for an Iranian physics. Maybe in gym they�ll learn how to wire their bomb vests and they�ll convert the football field to a terrorist training camp.�
Thus commenced the smear campaign against the Khalil Gibran International Academy and, specifically, Debbie Almontaser. For the next six months, from blogs to talk shows to cable networks to the right-wing press, the hysteria and hatred never ceased. Regrettably, it worked.
Ms. Almontaser resigned as principal earlier this month.
The school is designed to be entirely secular. It is named for a Lebanese-born Christian poet and visual artist who lived in New York. Eventually it is to include the sixth through twelfth grades, offering classes such as math and science in both Arabic and English. The academy will be one of more than 60 existing dual-language city schools teaching in languages such as Russian, Spanish and Chinese. The new principal unfortunately does not speak Arabic, but the fact that she is a Jew rather than an Arab might not have been a problem for the school’s cosmopolitan namesake.
For a richer perspective read this excellent narrative from Steve Quester, a New York educator, activist and friend of mine, who is familiar with Almontaser’s work.
There’s also an excellent piece, “Jewish Shootout Over Arab School“, in The Jewish Week, from which I have excerpted a section describing Almontaser’s place in the larger community and the dismay of one wise and compassionate Jew concerned about what the incident will mean to his own community as well as that of New York City and even the nation as a whole:
Almontaser, a public school teacher and administrator, was born in Yemen but immigrated here when she was three. Since 9/11, the slight woman in a hijab had emerged as a prominent advocate in the Muslim community for reaching out and working with other faiths. After the attacks her son, an Army Reserve officer, served as a rescue worker at Ground Zero.
Among other things, Almontaser had invited hundreds of Jews and Christians to her own home in the wake of the terrorist attack to help defang fear and anger towards Muslims. She had joined social action groups, such as We Are All Brooklyn, an inter-ethnic initiative supported by JCRC [the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater New York], to combat hate crimes in the dense, mixed neighborhoods of that borough. She had trained with ADL�s anti-bias program, A World of Difference, to become a better facilitator for diversity training and inter-group dynamics in the public schools.
Rabbi [Michael] Paley, a scholar-in-residence with UJA-Federation, warned that the prominent role played by a faction within the Jewish community in the attack on her would �come back and bite us. This begins to destroy the America that’s been so good to us.� Rabbi Paley, who has met Almontaser during interfaith activities, emphasized that in his remarks on this issue he was speaking only for himself and not his organization.
�The most important thing to know about the Muslim community here is that it replicates the Jewish community from many years ago,� he said. �These are people trying to become Americans as hard as they can, and also trying hard not to lose their identity, just as groups before them did.
�The idea that unless they pass an acid test � that Muslims are terrorists until proven innocent � will mean that none will pass. We are ultimately blocking them from becoming American,� he warned. The result, he said, would be an Arab immigrant community more isolated and less assimilated, �like the Arabs in France.� [my italics]
The message to the Arab-American community as a result of this debacle was, �You�re a fool to think they�ll accept you,� he said.
[image of James Pinckney Alley from Assumption College]
GUANTANAMO DELENDA EST!

our shame and ignominy abstracted as a color which has become familiar to the entire world
This post is part of a series begun on May 21, 2007, which will continue until the U.S. concentration camps at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere around the world have been razed.
And from Iraq, a related story:
WASHINGTON, Aug. 24 The number of detainees held by the American-led military forces in Iraq has swelled by 50 percent under the troop increase ordered by President Bush, with the inmate population growing to 24,500 today from 16,000 in February, according to American military officers in Iraq.
. . . .
Interestingly, weve found that the vast majority are not inspired by jihad or hate for the coalition or Iraqi government the vast majority are inspired by money, said Capt. John Fleming of the Navy, a spokesman for the multinational forces detainee operations. The men are paid by insurgent leaders. The primary motivator is economic theyre angry men because they dont have jobs, he said. The detainee population is overwhelmingly illiterate and unemployed. Extremists have been very successful at spreading their ideology to economically strapped Iraqis with little to no formal education.”
Spreading the blessings of the American corrections system to needy people everywhere.

[fabric color swatch, otherwise unrelated to Guantanamo, from froggtoggs; second image by Benjamin Lowy via the NYTimes]
UPDATE on Deutsche Bank fire

It seems that the tangled story at which I could only hint in my Tuesday post, “Ayn Rand linked to Deutsche Bank skyscraper tragedy?”, has caused some serious bustle around the city desk at the NYTimes.
The lead story on the front page reports that the firm whose creators picked the Ayn Rand hero John Galt for its corporate name was a paper corporation with no employees. It had been assembled to insulate or hide its “integrity”-challenged owners and officers from the view of its clients, the people and officers of the New York community. This is the company which was given the lucrative contract to perform one of the most hazardous and certainly one of the most visible jobs in the city if not in the entire country.
Two firefighters died fighting a fire inside the building last Saturday, probably as the result of criminal negligence.
Meanwhile, inside the same section of the paper we learn in another story that the New York Fire Department hadn’t inspected the Deutsche Bank building’s standpipe or sprinkler system since 1996, in spite of the fact that twice-monthly inspections were mandatory for buildings under demolition. It seems the department was also aware that the sprinkler system was not working. Some have argued that the FDNY was unwilling or unequipped to enter a building permeated with the toxins that had necessitated its condemnation, but since demolition began firefighters had been in the building on at least two occasions for reasons unrelated to the standpipe or the sprinkler system.
[image of the two firefighters from NYFD via Gothamist]
“Purple Hearts” at Jen Bekman

Spc. Sam Ross
21 years old, 82nd Airborne, was wounded May 18, 2003 in Baghdad when a bomb blew up during a munitions disposal operation, leaving him blinded and an amputee. After many, surgeries, Ross was sent home to western Pennsylvania where he lives alone in a trailer, in one of the poorest counties in the state.
Photographed October 19, 2003 in the woods near his trailer in Dunbar Township, Pennsylvania.
“I lost my leg just below the knee. Lost my eyesight. I have shrapnel in pretty much every part of my body. Got my finger blown off. It don’t work right. I had a hole blown through my right leg. You know, not really anything major. I get headaches. And my left ear, it don’t work either.”
“I don’t have any regrets. It was the best experience of my life.”

Cpl. Tyson Johnson III
22 years old, 205th Military Intelligence Brigade, was wounded September 20, 2003 in a mortar attack on the Abu Ghraib prison. He suffered massive internal injuries and is 100 percent disabled.
Photographed May 6, 2004 at his home in Prichard, Alabama.
“Most of my friends they were losing it out there. They would do anything to get out of there, do anything. I had one of my guys, he used to tell me, ‘My wife just had my son. I can’t wait to get home and see him.’ And you know, he died out there. He sure did and I have to think about that everyday.”
“I got a bonus in the National Guards for joining the Army. Now I’ve got to pay the bonus back and it’s $2999. The Guard wants it back. It’s on my credit that I owe them that. I’m burning on the inside. I’m burning.”
There is nothing like this “summer show” anywhere in the city, if not the entire country.
Jen Bekman’s current exhibition, “Purple Hearts” neither seeks nor requires an introduction. You may already have seen the book, but walk into the gallery’s very neat pocket space on Spring Street on the Lower East Side before this deceptively-quiet installation closes on August 30. You will leave speechless, if not gasping for breath, while trying to understand how we got to this, and where do we go from here?
Nina Berman began this powerful body of work several years ago . Unfortunately her young portrait subjects had beaten her to it.
The gallery has scheduled a book-signing, reception and talk with the artist on Wednesday, August 29 from 6 to 8pm. Because of the gallery’s small size, those who are interested in attending, or in reserving a book, are asked to rsvp [info@jenbekman.com]
[images from Jen Bekman]
TEAR IT DOWN
Guantanamo. Again.
But this time I’m encouraged by the appearance of a new site devoted specifically to the subject. Amnesty International has just gone public with a new site, tearitdown.org, dedicated to solely shutting down permanently the most notorious of the U.S. concentration camps.
![]()
I had purchased the domain they’re using sometime last year with the intention of devoting it to a totally different form of protest, one which would not have addressed such fundamental issues of humanity. When Barry and I were approached by Amnesty’s people I was happy to see it depart for higher purpose.
Bon voyage!
[all images from Amnesty]