
untitled January 21, 2004
My own little camera is spending two weeks in the camera hospital, so the images have been few and far between lately. I borrow Barry’s sturdy Canon occasionally.
“replacing people for a basketball court”

Big money interests, not least the NYTimes, want to displace families, artisans and artists, and in fact physically destroy an entire Brooklyn community, in order to build a commercial sports arena.
Our friend Charles Goldman once lived in a building on Dean Street that will be levelled for the proposed Nets Stadium. New York and the world are much better for what he and other artists created there.
Jimmy Breslin has the scoop on the human cost, and gives it out today in his column piece, “So Whose Domain Is It?”.
The claim is that the land can be condemned under eminent domain. This is a way for the government to take land for needed undertakings. The Verrazano Bridge, for one.
But this time they want to take 71 buildings on 10 acres and more than three blocks. This would throw out 864 residents, including 200 people who work in their homes at things like violins, canvas stretching, architecture, photography, painting. They make gentle so much around them, and their government wants to replace them with a basketball team that has a player named Jason Kidd and would be a nice addition to Brooklyn, if you had them in an arena someplace that disturbed no human beings who contribute a lot more to the world than a foul shot.
The idea of replacing people for a basketball court is so insane that of course it brought me right back to the Corona houses – the Corona 69 – who were going to be displaced by an athletic field for Forest Hills High School. The 69 residents had a meeting at the Corona Volunteer Ambulance Hall and it was at a point when they had no chance, the courts and the thieves had it wrapped up. Then a fairly young, unknown Court Street lawyer named Mario Cuomo walked into the hall and said he would represent them. Soon, he had legal paper flying and motions causing dizziness in courts. The city lawyers were sick to their stomachs. And the people rose up and produced this one most memorable scene of civic rebellion:
The great Mrs. Nellie Picarelli stood up at a meeting in a school auditorium and reached into her purse and brought out a big hammer and waved it in the air.
“Why don’t you try coming to take my house?” she yelled at a politician.
Target Margin’s “Lord of the Rings”*

Faust (Will Badgett) studies Mephistopheles (David Greenspan)
Goethe’s back, and Faust is with him.
Ok, they never really left, except that some of us thought we could ignore them now. David Herskovits, Douglas Langworthy and Target Margin Theater are going to make that very difficult for some time.
They have taken upon themselves the enormous task of translating and staging the complete text of Goethe’s iconic play, “Faust”, the entire project to be spread over at least several years time.
This week we saw the product of their initial engagement with the material, a dramatization of the first part of the first part, which they have dubbed, “These Very Serious Jokes”. The title comes from a reference Goethe himself once made to his magnificent 12,000 line verse-play. Target Margin begins with a completely faithful revival of the first 2,600 lines, in addition to the inclusion of the author’s dedicatory poem and two introductory scenes.
Both of us were a bit rusty on “Faust” [actually Barry was rusty, I was literately virginal] and we going into the show we welcomed the opportunity of seeing an intimate modern representation of one of the great monuments in European culture. Even with my experience of TMT’s wonderful production history I hadn’t expected that we would be in for so much more than brilliant entertainment and a provocative staging.
It was hilarious, seriously. And very very smart. Some of that is Goethe, but if I think I’m already able to talk [back?] to Faust, Mephistophes, and even The Lord, although the story has barely begun, I’ll credit the company. Anyone who can take advantage of this great theatrical opportunity is in for a wonderful ride. David and the company plan eventully to present their sections of the play as an integrated piece, but in the meantime we will have the great pleasure of participating in a new creation as we see the parts follow each other to their conclusion.
I hurried home Tuesday night to check our copies of the “Faust” printed text. Surely not every bit of what we heard was Goethe? But it was. We were both astounded. The translation is that magnificent. On the other hand, not everything we saw was in the original. Target Margin’s contemporary inventions in twisted genious, together with Doug Langwothy’s translation, is what makes the story our own, right now.
Have fun.
But you’re going to have to hurry, since this section’s run ends next Sunday. The location is the tiny downstairs theatre at HERE Arts center, 145 6th Avenue, near Spring. The time is 7pm on Friday and 2pm and 7pm on Saturday. On Sunday there is another performance at 7pm and from Tuesday, Jan 27, until Saturday, Jan 31, the shows will begin at 8:30 pm. There will be matinees on Saturday, Jan 31 and Sun, Feb 1, at 4pm.
The number to call is 718-398-3095.
* mumbled by one of the cast members while David Herkovits was delivering his prefatory notes in front of the audience
NOTE Something else that remains from Goethe’s text is Auerbach’s Keller. It’s a great scene in the play, and its environment is familiar to anyone who’s spent time in a tavern. The Keller too checks out perfectly. The real Auerbach’s was founded in 1525, so it was already a couple of centuries old when Goethe immortalized it. It remains a tavern in Leipzig today more than two centuries later, having survived, like the legend of Faust itself, major plagues, the Reformation, the Religious Wars, the Peasant Rebellion, the 30 Years War, Napoleon’s armies, the Industrial Revolution and two World Wars.
[image from Lighting Dimensions]
we already have our memorials, and they’re repulsive
I’ve surprised even myself by not writing more about the various September 11 design proposals, now narrowed down to a mall dominated by a “Freedom Tower” and crying walls and wells “Reflecting Absence”. But I’m not going to start now.
Real critics have described any number of reasons to be disgusted with re-building and memorial plans at the World Trade Center site. For myself however the most important reason is the evil purposes in support of which the September 11 tragedy has repeatedly been invoked, both in cynicism and in ignorance.
We already have our memorials to September 11, in the form of domestic tyranny and world war, and both have been designed for perpetuity. While these prevail, anything we are doing at the scene downtown is likely to be obscene, not just in execrable taste.
team spirit smells
From a Deborah Solomon interview with Wallace Shawn in Sunday’s NYTimes Magazine”:
[The brilliant, solidly- Lefty author had just admitted that while he had no use for musicals, he was nevertheless very fond of “American popular songs in the cabaret tradition”.] So you take some pride in American culture.
To be honest, I see myself as a citizen of the planet. Even as a child, I always found it mindless to root for your own team. I was puzzled by the fact that people said their own team was better than other teams simply because it was theirs.
Later in the article he described his delightful idea of utopia, and responded to his interviewer’s odd introduction of the subject of marriage:
In an ideal world, people would be preoccupied with reading and writing poetry and having love affairs, as people were in the Japanese court in the 11th century, as described in ”The Tale of Genji.” If people were involved in that type of life, maybe there would be no war.
But it wouldn’t be great for sustaining marriages!
I was never married.
Don’t you live with the writer Deborah Eisenberg?
Yes, we’re having a love affair. If I wanted my personal life to be public, I would be married. Marriage is public. That’s what it means.
Have you ever desired the comforts of marriage?
I would say it is hard enough to make a plan for how you are going to spend an evening with somebody else. So to make a plan for how you are going to behave in 25 years seems based on a view of life that is incomprehensible to me.
But you must have some hopes for yourself in the future.
We’re in an emergency situation. The United States has become an absolutely terrifying country, and I would hope that I could participate in some way in stopping the horror and the brutality.
Good man.
Barry and I have tickets for Wednesday night’s performance of the New Group’s revival of Shawn’s “Aunt Dan and Lemon”. Somehow I missed it the first time around, in 1985, but I swore it wouldn’t happen again.
liberty up in smoke?

Langston, outside
Smart, generally progressive people should know better than to use their power and privilege to champion their personal addictions, especially ones which threaten their own lives and the lives of those who have to be around them.
A silly piece in the local section of today’s NYTimes is more than a case in point, since it represents itself as a news article about the not-so-private campaign of the editor of another publication to reverse New York City’s smoking ban.
The reporter writes that Mayor Bloomberg and Graydon Carter, the editor of Vanity Fair, used to be friends.
But that was before Mr. Bloomberg imposed an almost total ban on indoor smoking in public places in New York City, infuriating Mr. Carter [actually, it was the City Council which imposed the ban, in 42 to 7 vote], who enjoyed lighting up in restaurants, bars and, according to three summonses he has received from city inspectors, his office at the sleek West 42nd Street headquarters of Condé Nast. Mr. Carter has called the enforcement of the new law harassment, among other things.
“It is an important issue,” said Mr. Carter. “It is about freedom and your own civil liberties, and it is about the city. This is not Denver, it is not Seattle, it is a big rough turbine that is fueled by cigarette smoke and food and liquor. People want to go out at night. If your best friend smokes, it makes it very awkward.”
Over the last six months, Vanity Fair has been ripping into Mr. Bloomberg on almost a monthly basis, vexing the mayor’s staff and angering Mr. Bloomberg at times, too. In September, the magazine ran a lengthy profile of Mr. Bloomberg that was far from flattering, referring to him as “waiflike.”
Mr. Carter has also devoted no fewer than three editor’s letters to criticizing the mayor. In the latest, in the February issue of the magazine, Mr. Carter says the mayor is “like a husband who returns home after the honeymoon and announces to his new bride that he has decided that henceforth they will be vegans.”
For that same issue now on newsstands, Mr. Carter commissioned an article by Christopher Hitchens in which Mr. Hitchens chronicled his minor crime spree throughout the city feeding pigeons, smoking in a luxury car painting Mr. Bloomberg’s New York as something just short of a police state.
Carter is in good company, but he and his company are wrong. Lewis Lapham and Rick MacArthur, editor and publisher respectively of Harpers Magazine together with [perhaps less good company] Christopher Hitchens are among the more illustrious and outspoken sour critics of New York’s public smoking ban, and all of them have used their very prominent professional names, visibilty and pulpits to attack it relentlessly either in print, on radio, in public forums, or in any combination of the three.
But New York is not a police state because of laws which protect public health. Mr. Carter and the rest would deserve our attention and our respect if they were talking about the laws and police tactics which directly threaten freedom of speech and assembly in the city they all profess to be defending.
[image from Anthology of Modern American Poetry]
even fools aren’t safe in a fool’s world

Could there be a more damning indictment of the intelligence of most Americans than the figures reported in the latest poll?
Despite those vulnerabilities [figures showing doubts about his economic and other domestic policies], which the Democratic presidential candidates are busily trying to exploit, Mr. Bush retains a powerful advantage on national security. Sixty-eight percent, including majorities of both Democrats and independents, gave him high marks for the campaign against terrorism, and 68 percent said the Bush administration’s policies have made the United States safer from terrorist attacks.
[While we’re at it, we should note that this poll is the work of, well, yeah, the NYTimes/CBS News, and what the heck is a newspaper doing putting its own poll as its lead front page story?]
Just where is the evidence of our increased safety? There have been no more terrorist attacks within the U.S. since September 11. If that’s evidence, it’s the same evidence that showed we were safe before September 11. Are these 68 percenters saying we’re safer because only people outside the U.S. are being slaughtered – by ourselves and others, in huge numbers which happen to include a certain count of American soldiers as well?
Accepting tyranny and waging world war, whether in bits or in total, will not make us safe.
And, back to my original question, I no longer buy the argument that our media makes us stupid. If that were true, everyone would be cheering for the little man in the flight suit. By the Times‘s count there may still be some on the sidelines.
[image from The Museum of Hoaxes]
“saints”

Tom Hurndall
He’s gone. I had actually thought that he had died last April, but Thomas Hurndall had survived in a vegetative state until this week, when he succumbed to pneumonia in a London hospital. He had turned 22 while lying in a coma. Hurndall had so little time, but while he was alive he seemed to care about helping others more than anything else.
He had joined protests against the war in Iraq, but his mother Jocelyn has said he was not that political – although he did like to help the underdog.
His family remember the 22-year-old as someone who squared up to a mugger trying to steal a boy’s mobile phone near his home in Tufnell Park, north London.
His sister Sophie told the BBC: “Tom was somebody who made everybody laugh, he was intelligent, witty, caring – the kind of person who was always sticking up for anybody who was in trouble.”
. . . .
His family say his diaries show he was clear headed and went with an open mind to Rafah, determined to draw his own conclusions about what was happening to Palestinian civilians.
But he was deeply affected by the sight of a young boy he had photographed being shot in the shoulder.
Eyewitnesses are said to have seen him pulling two Palestinian children to safety in Rafah when he was shot in April 2003.
Aimée Stauffer-Stitelmann is still alive, very much alive, at 79. This week she became the first citiizen to seek to clear her name under a new Swiss law which is intended to finally pardon those who were penalized for helping victims of Nazism. Many Swiss citizens had been tried and disciplined or imprisoned for violating the country’s neutrality before and during World War II while trying to aid victims of the Nazi regime. Stauffer-Stitelmann is credited with saving the lives of 15 to 20 Jewish children and assisting a number of Resistance fighters, beginning while she was still a teenager. She has in fact been an activist all of her life.
After the war, Ms. Stauffer-Stitelmann said, she supported partisans fighting Franco in Spain and organized protests against apartheid in South Africa and the American war in Vietnam, and was at the front of antiglobalization marches last summer in Evian, France, during a meeting of the major industrial nations.
After retiring as an elementary school teacher in 1987, she helped set up an underground school in a church to teach French to the children of illegal immigrants. (The children were banned from attending public schools.)
Her political activities were secretly monitored by the Swiss government until the 1980’s, until public revelations about the extensive monitoring of Swiss citizens ended the practice in the late 1980’s.
According to her file, which is now public, she was accused, among other things, of subscribing to Communist publications and helping Spain’s anti-fascist movement, and of organizing a news conference in Bern against the Vietnam war, where she even “paid for the room and the aperitifs.”
Dorothy Day died in 1980, but the work which she began continues today, usually benefiting most those neglected or insulted by other institutions, “the homeless, exiled, hungry, and foresaken”, in words which appear on the website of the organization she founded, The Catholic Worker Movement.
Late Tuesday night we found ourselves walking past their New York headquarters, Mary House, on East 3rd Street. It was freezing cold outside. Inside, up a few steps and plainly visible and secure in the lobby of the modest nineteenth-century building, was one or more of those big canvas-sling mail bins on wheels often used by street people to store and move their possessions around the city. The cart was more than full. Through the windows below grade we could see a cozy lounge and some people bustling about. Those Workers and their guests represent more than food and shelter.
The nuclear age has sharpened awareness of the need for disarmament and alternatives to war. The widening gap between rich and poor in our country and between nations has spurred greater urgency in the quest for a more just social order. But the distinguishing marks of the movement remain smallness, decentralization, personal responsibility, the personal response to persons in need in direct encounter and a search for answers to the questions that arise from that meeting: Why are there so many poor and abandoned? What is honest work? What is due workers and the unemployed? What is the relationship between political, social and economic democracy, and between these and the common good? [excerpt from a description of the movement found on their own site]
These three individuals, and those who work with their heritage and their spirit all over the world really are “saints”, but we don’t have to”canonize” them to recognize or emulate their selfless concern and their work for others.
Meanwhile, in St. Patrick’s Cathedral on 5th Avenue, the very grand showplace of the American Catholic Church, the homeless are thrown into the streets every night by ushers and police. This is not the work of saints. It’s not even the work of decent human beings. Jimmy Breslin writes today:
They were in a palace away from the cold, the most famous church of the Catholics in America. It is supposed to represent the Lord’s religion.
On this cold night, one of the ushers said that the church closes at 8:35 p.m. Exactly.
And at a little before 8:30, a man on the right side stood up, yawned, stretched and then gathered his plastic bags and walked down the aisle.
From far up in front, a woman pulled her suitcase on loud wheels.
At 8:35, a cop and an usher walked around the church telling homeless people that the church was closing and they had to go out into the cold.
“Nobody can stay?” an usher was asked.
“Church closes,” he said.
In the last row on the left side, a man stirred, then sat bolt upright. He put on a blue wool hat and lifted a backpack that he carefully put on. He had two heavy shirts to fight the cold. He started out. People were coming from the darkness on the side aisles. Soon, the church was empty.
As I finish posting this tonight, the temperature reads 1 degree above zero fahrenheit, with 21 mph winds.
[image by Kay Fernandes on The Thomas Hurndall Fund site]
city winter

SculptureCenter, Long Island City, 4:45 pm, January 10, 2004
everyone moving on
A friend of ours, Lothar Albrecht, is opening a third branch of his very interesting Frankfurt art gallery in Beijing next month. Until we received the announcement in the mail today, we had understood the new venue was going to be in Japan. That was going to be exciting enough, since the only other location until now was Zurich. This latest development is totally unexpected and of an entirely different magnitude, for obvious political and cultural reasons.
The L.A. Galerie Beijing website is not yet fully operational, but the invitation reveals that the gallery will be showing the work of both Chinese and foreign artists. Great!
We wish Lothar, and everyone in China who makes art and who loves art, the very best.
UPDATE The gallery is to be located in a building constructed during the Ming Dynasty, but the interior will be the classic white cube.
[the image above, of Beijing opera figures, is from the Chinese website and unfortunately is not yet identified]