
secret war plans, still secret
Did Dick Cheney’s secret energy policy task force meetings discuss an Iraq war? Former NJ governor James J. Florio suggests the possibility. Sure would help explain why the administration continues to fight so hard to keep the meeting records from the public.
It is hard to imagine that the subject of Iraq and oil did not come up. Any specific discussion that just happened to preview our subsequent course of action in Iraq would be problematic for the president. What did he know and when did he know it? Pre-emptive war for reasons hidden from the public would be a historic first and a dangerous precedent.
UPDATE on Bush denial of American freedom
I’ve located the complete statement I described yesterday in which Bush announced that “Free nations don’t develop weapons of mass destruction.” Silly us. After all the fuss it appears right on the White House website, in the section, “Jobs & Economic Growth.”
The context is described as remarks delivered at the Midwest Airlines Center in Milwaukee yesterday morning. This is the entire paragraph:
We have more work to do in Iraq. A free Iraq, a peaceful Iraq will help change an area of the world that needs peace and freedom. A peaceful Iraq and a free Iraq is part of our campaign to rid the world of terror. And that’s why the thugs in Iraq still resist us, because they can’t stand the thought of free societies. They understand what freedom means. See, free nations are peaceful nations. Free nations don’t attack each other. Free nations don’t develop weapons of mass destruction. [my italics] There will be a free and peaceful Iraq. What’s taking place in Iraq is the evolution of a society, to be democratic in nation — nature, a society in which the people are better off.
So there it is, boys and girls.
[thanks again to atrios, and to lunaville for the link itself]
Paris awaits liberation – ours
It’s so refreshing to get a comment like the one at the bottom of this post which arrived today from “old Europe,” after a couple of weeks of being inundated with the endless automatic mailgrams of littlegreenfootballs nuts:
” . . . French peoples knew that Bush will be a mess before he was elected, and the bet ares already on how we will dress the paris streets when Howard Dean will meet Chirac in Paris next year!”
And I want to be there!
coming home

A group of caskets moves up Broadway today, holding remains beyond just bones
Yes, New York had slaves, and apparently they weren’t all barbers and musicians.
Some of them, all still anonymous, are being returned tomorrow to the downtown Manhattan site of their burial in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
Twelve years after workers accidentally uncovered a burial ground for colonial era blacks in downtown Manhattan, the remains arrived Friday, headed for the empty lot where they were first discovered.
The remains, scheduled to be reinterred Saturday, arrived at Pier 11 at Wall Street on three police boats, in four small wooden coffins carved in Ghana. New York was the last stop on a five-city procession.
After a ceremony at South Street Seaport, the coffins were scheduled to be taken by procession to the African Burial Ground, located at the intersection of Duane and Elk streets.
Without a lot of in-the-face activism on the part of some dedicated New Yorkers over the last 12 years, we would hardly be aware of this part of our history even today.
Initially, the federal government tried not to comply with legal mandates about what to do in such a situation. But African American New Yorkers, including then Mayor David Dinkins, pressed the government to respect the remains found there and to find a way to honor this sacred space. After vigils and protests and religious observances and meetings held at the site by many in the community, construction was halted until all the remains could be unearthed and moved to be studied, with the promise that they would be re-interred back at the site.
Brian Lehrer devoted part of his WNYC program this morning to the early history of Africans in New York and the events of today and tomorrow. What scientists found in 10 years study of the bones now being brought back to New York was evidence of disease and the stress of carrying heavy loads. It was established that most were born in Africa, specifically west and central Africa, and that both the death rate and the rate of reproduction were extrordinarily poor. The data suggests that the slaves were treated as expendable, and that attrition was addressed by bringing in more.
The NYTimes devoted half of a page to the story in yesterday’s editions.
Not one of the skeletons in the burial ground could be linked to a person with a name, [urban anthropologist Dr. Sherrill D.] Wilson said. She says this is evidence that “these people were undocumented because they were viewed as a disposable population.” Also, she said, almost half of the bodies found were children, which suggests “they were literally worked to death.”
Slavery ended in New York in 1827, but the story continues.
For more information, including that about events this week, see the African Burial Ground site.
A FOOTNOTE:
It was during the Brian Leher Show, in a section not included in the on-line report linked above, that I heard about several caucasian bodies found buried with the others.
How could that be, in a 6-acre cemetary which the city had made necessary because blacks were not allowed to bury their own in the same ground with whites?
In 1741 New York thought it was the victim of a slave conspiracy or uprising, because of a series of unexplained fires. When the hysteria had subsided, 31 slaves and 5 free whites, suspected sympathizers or accomplices, had been executed. The authorities decided to visit the worst possible humiliation upon the caucasians; they were interred along with the slaves.
Africans customarily buried their dead facing west. The bodies of the sympathizers appeared to be lovingly laid facing east, the custom of their time and people.
[image from REUTERS/Chip East]
better lock that boy up, guys!
I haven’t seen it yet in a written report from the commercial media, but according to Atrios, Bush said just moments ago, “Free nations don’t develop weapons of mass destruction.”
Apparently those who watched CNN couldn’t have missed this one.
There will be more to follow, I’m sure.
greenmarket (apples)

more things French

Le Scandale Plame: The Adventure Begins
It’s been a very good day.
Technical note: Interestingly, the expression, “nonchalant,” is no longer in the French language itself:
Etymology: French, from Old French, from present participle of nonchaloir to disregard, from non– + chaloir to concern, from Latin calEre to be warm — more at LEE
Date: circa 1734
: having an air of easy unconcern or indifference
synonym see COOL
[Merriam-Webster]
greenmarket (purple plums)
speculating about Coups de’Etat
Sometimes you just gotta speculate. Sometimes you just can’t wait for others to get around to telling you what’s happening. Besides, I admit I have some spare time.
This comes from my brother in Washington, who writes, “Here is a ‘must-read’ article on the current Coup d’Etat.” If you read billmon’s ruminations, you’ll wonder which Coup he means. Yes! I thought that would pique some interest!
The billmon post links to Brad De Long’s amazing, much longer piece in order to speculate about why the CIA has taken upon itself such a heavy role in l’Affaire Plame. [I feel the urge to use French as much as possible these days.]
But the more I watch the story unfold, the more I think something deeper and darker is at stake. It seems the top career elite at the CIA, plus Tenet, has pulled out all the stops to try to bust up the Rove machine. That suggests they’re worried about something much bigger than just bureaucratic turf or the WMD blame game.
I can’t do Bro justice with a proper credit for the heads-up, since he doesn’t have a weblog, and because I have to protect his anonymity, but I know you’d really like him.